Jeffrey M. Williams

Attorney in Doylestown, PA
Jeffrey is the founding Partner of Williams Family Law, P.C. Widely regarded as the top divorce attorney in Bucks County, he is one of the leading family law attorneys in the Greater Philadelphia area. Jeffrey concentrates his practice on domestic relations, primarily handling complex divorce, high-income support and custody cases. His courtroom instincts and honed litigation skills have made him a fixture in Philadelphia-area divorce law for over two decades. Prior to establishing his own practice in 2004, Jeffrey was a partner of an established Bucks County law firm where two of his former law partners went on to serve as Judges on the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas. He also served as an Assistant/Deputy District Attorney in Bucks County from 1981 to 1985, which has provided him valuable courtroom experience. Since 2005, Jeffrey has been selected annually as a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer through a peer-review process published by Philadelphia Magazine. He is the only Bucks County attorney to be accepted as a Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) and is a Diplomate of the American College of Family Trial Lawyers, whose membership is limited to 100 attorneys nationally. He also has received Martindale-Hubbell's "AV" rating, the highest legal ability and ethical standards rating, and was elected by his peers as one of the Ten Best Matrimonial Attorneys in the Five-County Philadelphia area in the two years the award was given.
888-841-2388
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Domestic Relations
  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Marital Agreements
  • Marital Property Distribution
  • Marital Property Settlements
  • Postnuptial Agreements
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Spousal Support
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Appellate Practice
  • Alimony

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Founding Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1981, Pennsylvania
1982, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania and U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Emory University School of Law
    Class of 1981
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Dickinson College
    Class of 1978
    B.A.

    Associations & Memberships

    American Bar Association; Pennsylvania (Member, Family Law Section, 1986-; Member of Council, 1996-2006; Former Secretary; Chair, Family Law Section, 2010) and Bucks County (Member, Family ... More

    Bar Fellowship

    of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) and is a Diplomate of the American College of Family Trial Lawyers, whose membership is limited to 100 attorneys nationally. He also has received Martindale-Hubbell's "AV" rating, the highest legal ability and ethical standards rating, and was elected by his peers as one of the Ten Best Matrimon... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    215-340-2207 Call Now

    Fax

    215-340-2208

    Email

    Send email to Jeffrey M. Williams


    Office Information
    Jeffrey M. Williams
    Founding Partner
    One block from Bucks County Court House, Red Brick Building 43 North Pine Street,
    Doylestown, PA 18901-4332

    Loading...

    Logo
    Williams Family Law, P.C. (Doylestown, Pennsylvania)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.