Nicholas H. Rodriguez

Attorney in Dover, DE
Order of the Coif; Phi Beta Kappa; Phi Alpha Delta; Xi Sigma Pi. Author: Comment, 17 Washington & Lee Law Review 260 (160). U.S. Commissioner, Judicial District of Delaware, 1961-1966. City Solicitor, City of Dover, 1969—.
302-724-4587
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury Law

     

    Peer Rating

    av

    Overall Peer Rating

    5.0 out of 5.0
    • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Member

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1961, Delaware

    Credit Cards Accepted
    Discover
    Mastercard
    Visa
    Law School Attended

    Washington & Lee University
    Class of 1961
    J.D.
    summa cum laude

    University Attended

    Pennsylvania State University
    Class of 1957
    B.S.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1934
    Dover, Delaware, December 28, 1934

    Associations & Memberships

    Kent County (President, 1971-1972), Delaware State (First Vice-President, 1971-1972) and American Bar Associations; Delaware Trial Lawyers Association; American Association for Justice.... More

    Bar Fellowship

    American College of Trial Lawyers.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    302-674-0140

    Fax

    302-674-1830

    Email

    Send email to Nicholas H. Rodriguez


    Office Information
    Nicholas H. Rodriguez
    Member
     414 South State Street, P.O. Box 497,
    Dover, DE 19903-0497

    Maintains an office in multiple locations
    Loading...

    Logo
    Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A. (Dover, Delaware)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.