Carlson, Hammond & Paddock, L.L.C.

Law Firm in Denver, CO
303-731-0776

View Web Site

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Water Rights
  • Water Quality
  • Environmental Law
  • Administrative Law and Agricultural Law.
  • Public Land Law
  • Real Property
  • Civil Trials
 

Peer Rating

Rated

Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
5.0 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
Member
5.0 out of 5.0
Member
5.0 out of 5.0
Member
5.0 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
John Undem Carlson
John Undem Carlson
Member
(1940-1992)

Firm Details

Year Established

1986

Firm Size

5

Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
Clients

Mountain Coal Co., Board of Water Works of Pueblo Colorado, Colorado Springs Utilities, Colorado Water Resources & Power Development Authority, Forbes, Irrigationists' Association, Rio Grande Canal Water Users Assn., Rio Grande Water Users Assn., San Luis Valley Water Conservancy District, Santa Maria Reservoir Co., Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co., Upper Platte & Beaver Canal Co., City of Westminster and Colorado Canal Companies.

Reference

Wells Fargo Bank West and N.A.

Contact Information

Firm Address

Carlson, Hammond & Paddock, L.L.C.
1900 Grant Street, Suite 1200,
Denver, CO 80203
U.S.A.

Phone 1

303-731-0776

Phone 2

303-861-9000

Telefax

303-861-9026

Email

Send email to Carlson, Hammond & Paddock, L.L.C.

Firm Website

http://www.chp-law.com

Office Information
 1900 Grant Street, Suite 1200,
Denver, CO 80203

Loading...



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.