Mary Janet Huber LinkedIn

Attorney in Decatur, GA
Presentations and Papers: Metro City County Attorneys' Institute, "Recent Developments in Employment Law," March 2009; "Public Sector Employment Law Update," June 2006; "EEOC Policies and Procedures," April 2004; "Avoiding Personal Liability for Workplace Claims," February 2004; "Due Process Update: Conducting a Liability-Free Public Sector Discipline Process," 2000; "Public Employees: Immunity from Suit and Exposure to Damages," 1999; National Lawyers Guild: "Black Letter Law Regarding Employment Claims under 2 U.S.C. Section 1983," 2003; Georgia Municipal Association: "Crawford-El v. Britton and how to use it," 1998; Metro City County Attorneys Institute: "Employment law update for government attorneys, 1998;" Annual Institute for City and County Attorneys: Recent judicial developments in employment law 2000; Sexual harassment law update, 1995; Local government liability for the use of volunteers, 1992.
404-378-0333
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Employment Law
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Litigation
  • Discrimination
  • Public Employment
  • Employment Contracts and Agreements
  • Administrative Hearings and Appeals

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1975, Tennessee
1977, Georgia
Georgia Court of Appeals
Georgia Supreme Court
U.S. District Court, Northern and Middle Districts of Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court

Law School Attended

University of Tennessee
Class of 1975
J.D.

University Attended

University of Pittsburgh
Class of 1972
B.A.
magna cum laude

Associations & Memberships

Dekalb Bar Association; State Bar of Georgia; National Employment Lawyers Association; Georgia Employment Lawyers Association.

Representative Cases

Does v. Fulton-DeKalb Hosp. Auth., 2010 U.S.App. LEXIS 26412 (11th Cir. 2010); Abdur-Rahman v. Walker, 567 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2009); Hayes v. City of Atlanta, 294 Ga. App. 290 (2008); Miller & Billips v. Fulton DeKalb Hosp. Auth., 293 Ga. App. 601 (2008); Enwonwu v. Fulton DeKalb Hospital Auth., 286 Fed. Appx. 586 (11th Cir. 2008); Local 491 v. G... More

Contact Information

Phone

404-378-0333

Fax

404-806-6243

Email

Send email to Mary Janet Huber


Office Information
Mary Janet Huber
Member
Fidelity Bank Building 160 Clairemont Avenue, Suite 200,
Decatur, GA 30030-2623

Loading...

Logo
Mary J. Huber, Attorney at Law (Decatur, Georgia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.