Law Office of J. Peyton Quarles

Law Firm in Daytona Beach, FL
Specializing in Criminal Law and Family Law for over 30 years. Serving Volusia, Flagler, Putnam and surrounding counties.
386-255-0305

View Web Site

About This Firm

The office of J. Peyton Quarles practices law in Daytona Beach, Florida and Volusia Co..

Our entire staff is dedicated to helping clients with their legal matters regarding:

-Criminal Law

-Family Law

-Divorce

Please contact our Daytona Beach law firm with questions about your legal issue. Provide as much information as possible regarding your inquiry. While this contact does not serve to establish an attorney/client relationship, it will allow our legal team to begin an assessment of your case.

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Probate.
 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
1.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Value for Money
1.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 05/18/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Firm Details

Firm Size

1

Contact Information

Firm Address

Law Office of J. Peyton Quarles
Halifax Harbor Marina 125 Basin Street, Suite 215,
Daytona Beach, FL 32114-5078
U.S.A.

Phone

386-255-0305

Facsimile

386-255-2027

Email

Send email to Law Office of J. Peyton Quarles

Firm Website

http://www.peytonquarles.com

Office Information
Halifax Harbor Marina 125 Basin Street, Suite 215,
Daytona Beach, FL 32114-5078

Loading...



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.