Richard J. Wallace, III

Attorney in Dallas, TX
Mr. Wallace focuses his practice in the area of commercial, business, and intellectual property litigation and oil and gas. His clients range from Fortune 500 Companies to small and medium size businesses.

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Business Law
  • Creditors Rights
  • Oil and Gas
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Trademark Infringement
  • Eminent Domain


Overall Client Rating

in Debtor and Creditor
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 08/11/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1998, Texas and U.S. District Court, Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas

Law School Attended

Southern Methodist University
Class of 1998

University Attended

Winthrop University

Vanderbilt University
Class of 1994

Associations & Memberships

State Bar of Texas (Litigation and Intellectual Property Sections); Dallas Bar Association (Litigation Section).

Representative Cases

Bench Company, Inc. v. Nations Rent of Texas, L.P., 133 S.W.3d 907 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, no pet.)Scalini v. 2-The-Extreme, Inc., 10-04-00142-CV, 2004 WL 2830868 (Tex.App.-Waco Dec. 8th, 2004)Callnet Communications, Inc. v. Emergency Alert Protection, Inc., 05-02-00692-CV, 2002 WL 31312696 (Tex.App.-Dallas October 16, 2002).

Contact Information






Send email to Richard J. Wallace, III

Social Networking

Office Information
Richard J. Wallace, III
Lincoln Plaza 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 2700,
Dallas, TX 75201-3306


Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. (Dallas, Texas)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.