Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough

Law Firm in Dallas, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Drug Injury
  • Product Liability
  • Personal Injury.
  • Defective Medical Defense
  • Environmental Injury

Overall Client Rating

in Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury and Commercial Law
4.2 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 6 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 02/23/14
Posted by a Consumer on 02/23/14
1.0 out of 5.0
Communication is terrible. It has been over 3 years that they have been settling the Avandia lawsuit. In that time my mother died. They will never call back and we had our other attorney call them and they still won't call back. Had I known that they would be so unprofessional and irresponsible I definitely would have gone somewhere else. Please, if you value your case, go somewhere else.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 09/12/13
5.0 out of 5.0
They are a bunch of dedicated, hard-working attorneys and I engaged their services twice because twice I was made ill by some medicine I took. One was Seroquel, a popular anti-depressant and the other was Avandia. The Seroquel caused my diabetes and when they gave me Avandia to manage it, it caused my congestive heart failure. So I sued Astra-Zeneca and the makers of Avandia and I have now won cases thanks to their hard work.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 02/25/13
5.0 out of 5.0
They are a very good law firm and know their business quite well and also know how to get the job done that you hire them for. I'm very pleased with the way they handled my Seroquel case and the way they are handling my Avandia case at the present time. I would encourage anyone that has a legal issue to contact them.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Related Law Firms

Dallas, Texas
469-607-5944 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.