Chad Ruback LinkedIn

Attorney in Dallas, TX

Appellate Lawyer

214-522-4243
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Law

     

    Peer Rating

    av

    Overall Peer Rating

    5.0 out of 5.0
    • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

    Legal Community Activity

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Principal

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1997, Texas
    1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    2005, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and U.S. Supreme Court

    Law School Attended

    Southern Methodist University
    Class of 1997
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of Texas at Austin
    Class of 1994
    B.B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1972
    Kansas City, Missouri, December 6, 1972

    Associations & Memberships

    Dallas Bar Association (Member, Board of Directors, 2005-2006); State Bar of Texas (Member, Appellate Section, 1998 to present); Dallas Association of Young Lawyers (Member, Board of Directors, 200... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    214-522-4243

    Fax

    214-522-2191

    Email

    Send email to Chad Ruback

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    Chad Ruback
    Principal
     8117 Preston Road, Suite 300,
    Dallas, TX 75225

    Loading...

    Logo
    The Ruback Law Firm (Dallas, Texas)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.