Ronald K. Ziff

Attorney in Culver City, CA
Attorney Ronald Ziff was born in Culver City, California where he grew up and works today as a partner at Golsan Ziff & Ziff. Having devoted the last 20 years of his legal career exclusively to family law. Mr. Ziff became certified as a family law specialist in 1994. He is an active and respected member of the family law bar in Los Angeles. Mr. Ziff has served as a volunteer judge pro tem and as a mediator in Los Angeles County for more than 15 years and has served on the Board of the Association of Certified Family Law Specialists. As a former owner of a successful business, Mr. Ziff has a tough but practical and result oriented approach to family law litigation and negotiations. Mr. Ziff brings depth of experience in all aspects of family law litigation and mediation and significant experience including drafting Qualified Domestic Relations Orders and in the collection of family law judgments.
310-342-2818
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Domestic Relations
  • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
  • Divorce Mediation
  • Alimony
  • Annulment
  • Cohabitation Agreements
  • Community Property Law
  • Divorce
  • Divorce Arbitration
  • Domestic Partnerships
  • Domestic Torts
  • Domestic Violence
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Family Arbitration
  • Family Mediation
  • Gay and Lesbian Family Law
  • Uncontested Divorce
  • Legal Separation Agreements
  • Interstate Support
  • Marital Agreements
  • Marital Property Distribution
  • Marital Property Law
  • Marital Property Settlements
  • Matrimonial Law
  • Name Changes
  • No Fault Divorce
  • Non-Traditional Family Law
  • Palimony
  • Paternity
  • Post Divorce Modification
  • Postnuptial Agreements
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Restraining Orders
  • Spousal Support

 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 02/08/13
Posted by a Consumer on 02/08/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Ron Ziff and his staff was always a pleasure to work with, very responsive and concerned to the best possible outcome for myself and my family. I highly recommend them.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 02/01/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I have not been able to EVER get child support from my ex-husband and this has caused terrible financial struggle over ten years. My ex decided he wanted me to pay for someone to do a QDRO. Ron agreed to work with me, and ended up getting me child support as well as my share of the pension. He was careful and thoughtful. And calm.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1980, California

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa


Also accepts Other
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Golden West University
    Class of 1980
    J.D.

    University Attended

    West Los Angeles College; Sonoma State University

    Golden West University
    Class of 1978
    B.S.
    Law

    Birth Information

    Born in 1953
    Los Angeles, California, October 18, 1953

    Associations & Memberships

    State Bar of California; Association of Certified Family Law Specialists.

    Certifications

    (Certified Specialist, Family Law, The State Bar of California Board Of Legal Specialization)

    Contact Information

    Phone

    310-342-2818

    Fax

    310-342-2825

    Email

    Send email to Ronald K. Ziff


    Office Information
    Ronald K. Ziff
    Partner
     100 Corporate Pointe, Suite 180,
    Culver City, CA 90230

    Loading...

    Logo
    Golsan Ziff & Ziff (Culver City, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.