Jim Clancy LinkedIn

Attorney in Corpus Christi, TX
Current Commissioner for Texas Ethics Commission. Former Director, Nueces River Authority. While at the University of Texas, he became a member of the Board of Advocates and was Associate Editor of The Review of Litigation from 1994 to 1995 He was National Semi-Finalist in the Tournament of Champions Mock Trial Competition in 1995. Served as a Captain in the U.S. Army, 1986-1993. He is admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; U.S. District Court, Southern and Western Districts of Texas; and the U.S. Court of Veteran Appeals. He is also a Certified Civil Family Law Mediator.
361-886-3800
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

Commercial LitigationFiduciary Litigation
Commercial Litigation
85%
Fiduciary Litigation
15%

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1996, Texas
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
U.S. District Court, Southern and Western Districts of Texas

Law School Attended

University of Texas
Class of 1995
J.D.

University Attended

United States Military Academy
Class of 1986
B.S.
with high honors

Military

Captain, U.S. Army, 1986-1993

Associations & Memberships

State Bar of Texas Corpus Christi Bar Association.

Contact Information

Phone

361-886-3800

Fax

361-886-3805

Email

Send email to Jim Clancy

Social Networking



Office Information
Jim Clancy
Shareholder
Frost Bank Plaza 802 North Carancahua, Suite 1900,
Corpus Christi, TX 78401-0036

Loading...

Logo
Branscomb | PC (Corpus Christi, Texas)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.