Former Assistant District Attorney Se Habla Español 704-795-4567
George Wiseman is a seasoned trial attorney who provides his clients with exceptional representation. Mr. Wiseman is a former assistant district attorney with over thirty-five jury trials, ranging from major sex offenses and robbery to traffic matters. Mr. Wiseman has obtained the very unique status of being Board Certified in State Criminal Law, one of only two private attorneys in Cabarrus County to have done so. In addition to providing the highest level of representation, our office staffs two full-time legal assistants dedicated to providing the highest quality of service to our clients.
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 6 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.2 or higher.
About Awards
Client Champion Awards
Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity
and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service.
Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.
At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.
At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.
George W. Wiseman, Attorney at Law got this award in 2021
At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale Peer Awards
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious
Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Avvo Awards
Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A,
publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.
Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.
Mr. Wiseman stuck with me for a case that, once all was said and done, took 15 years to come to a conclusion. He was diligent and, no matter how much time had passed, seemed to remember even the smallest detail. His connections and insight from his prior position with the DA’s office was invaluable. More than anything else, at the lowest point of my entire life, he treated me with dignity and respect - I cannot overstate how unusual this was and how far that went towards helping me maintain my mental health. Your attorney believing you and believing IN you is pivotal. In the end, we succeeded. While I hope I never need Mr. Wiseman’s services again, he will continue to receive my highest recommendation.
George Wiseman stuck with our case during 2+ years of Covid-related delays and postponements and, along with his partner Ben, ultimately prevailed for us. Over the 2 years, George provided professional and well-thought though advice. He was honest in explaining the options we had and was always willing to listen to our frustrations during this long process. I highly recommend George Weisman and his associates to handle legal matters.
George Wiseman has always handled my tickets with diligence and he is very knowledgeable of his work. Also, he is very professional and would do the very best to help you with any criminal related issues. Highly recommend!
I have been very impressed with Mr. Wiseman's representation. He took the time to understand the case, gave a realistic set of expectations and outcomes, and provided expert advice. He charted a course to a best-case result and encouraged us to be patient while he worked the county court system towards that end. Frankly, it seemed a long shot but in the end, Mr. Wiseman delivered exactly as we all had hoped. I would recommend Mr. Wiseman for any criminal defense work and would use him again if the need arose.
Wow. An honest man that can work wonders in a court room.
Criminal Law
Posted by anonymous
November 11, 2018
Hired Law Firm
May appear slow in response pretrial, but excellent and outstanding in courtroom criminal defense. Very professional in court room defence. You won't be disappointed as long as you can provide evidence needed for your trial, and you follow-up with him on regular basis about facts in your case.
I wish I could say I’ve worked with Wiseman but I never got the chance to after getting the run around for a very long time, Natalie has to be the most unprofessional person I have ever worked with! She does not manage her time well, she will not answer your calls, she will give the run around about your case and wait last minute until your court date is a few days away to tell you information about your case. Natalie is very persistent about money although she will try to get your money before having any information on your case, There are no confirmation emails in regards to your court case, money or anything. They will send you a link for you to send money and the rest is history. I don’t blame Wiseman, just his big back assistant so good luck. Better off somewhere else.
Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page
Martindale Peer Reviews
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*
• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.
Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.