Jewell, Crump, Angermeier & Prall

Law Firm in Columbus, IN
Delivering high quality and cost effective legal services to every client
812-376-9751

Free Consultation

About This Firm

On the 14th day of February 1972, the law firm of Crump and Angermeier was formed on the second floor of the old First National Bank Building by F. Jefferson Crump, III and Gerald G. Angermeier. Ralph L. Jewell was admitted as a general partner on the 21st day of July 1975, after being in solo practice for several years; on the same date the partnership moved into its present building which was constructed especially for the needs of the firm.

Ralph L. Jewell retired from the active practice of law on the 30th day of June 1988. Jerry E. Prall joined the firm as an associate in 1990. Gerald G. Angermeier died on the 27th day of March 2005. Jerry E. Prall was added as a partner on April 3, 2005.

The firm serves Bartholomew County and the surrounding counties in the general practice of law. The firm strives daily to give its clients good quality and cost effective service.

Areas of Law

  • General Civil and Criminal Trial Practice. Driving While Intoxicated
  • Drug Crimes
  • Juvenile Law
  • Parole and Probation
  • Traffic Violations
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Slip and Fall
  • Wrongful Death
  • Wills and Probate
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Estate Planning
  • Taxation
  • Business Organizations
  • Commercial Law
  • Business Law
  • Business Litigation
  • Business Planning
  • Contracts
  • Buying and Selling a Business
  • Business Start-Ups
  • Debtor and Creditor
  • Collections
  • Business Enterprises
  • Corporate
  • Limited Liability Companies
  • Small Business
  • Partnerships
  • Family/Domestic Relations
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Divorce
  • Visitation Rights
  • Adoptions
  • Insurance Defense
  • Real Estate and Title Insurance Law.
 

Overall Client Rating

2.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.0
Responsiveness
2.7
Quality of Service
3.0
Value for Money
2.7

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 09/24/13
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Retired Partner
Gerald G. Angermeier
Gerald G. Angermeier
Retired Partner
(1940-2005)
Cari Boggs
Cari Boggs
Legal Support
Jennifer L. Newland
Jennifer L. Newland
Legal Support

Firm Details

Year Established

1972

Firm Size

2

Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
Clients

Mahan Leasing Co., Inc., Beckemeyer Insurance Agency, Inc., First National Corporation, American General Finance, Inc., Business & Industrial Federal Credit Union, Central Sheet Metal, Inc., Hessit Works, Inc., Indiana Conservation Officers, Shoe Biz, Inc., Geoby Children's Products, Inc., Goodbaby Children's Products, Inc., First Metals & Plastics Technologies, Inc., Jurrema, Inc., Hoosier Mikes, Inc., Boral Bricks, Inc., Orinoco Properties, Inc., Steaks R Us, LLC, Affordable Auto Sales and LLC.

Clients

Home Federal Savings Bank, Columbus, Indiana, National Attorney's Title Assurance Fund and Inc.

Contact Information

Firm Address

Jewell, Crump, Angermeier & Prall
1325 Washington Street, P.O. Box 1061,
Columbus, IN 47202-1061
U.S.A.

Phone

812-376-9751 Call firm now

Fax

812-372-6384

Email

Send email to Jewell, Crump, Angermeier & Prall

Office Information
 1325 Washington Street, P.O. Box 1061,
Columbus, IN 47202-1061

Loading...

Office Hours
Monday
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
Tuesday
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
Wednesday
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
Thursday
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
Friday
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
Saturday
By appointment


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.