William H. Bowman, III

Attorney in Columbia, SC
William H. "Bo" Bowman, III, concentrates his practice in the area of insurance and corporate defense litigation. He has prosecuted or defended civil jury trials in courts of general jurisdiction including trucking and transportation, premises liability, employment law, automobile liability, contract disputes, watercraft liability, insurance coverage disputes, and general civil and commercial litigation cases. Bo has been a member of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel since 1997 and serves on its Meeting Sites Committee.

Memberships

• South Carolina Bar

• Richland County Bar Association

• Lexington County Bar Association

• South Carolina Defense Trial Attorneys Association

• Presbyterian College
- Board of Visitors, 1989-1992

• University of South Carolina
- Board of Visitors, 2009-2012
- Vice-Chair Elect, 2011

• University of South Carolina Law School Alumni
- Association Board of Directors, 2003-2007

• Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

• American Board of Trial Advocates
- Diplomate

• John Belton O'Neall Inn of Court 2007-2012

Awards & Recognition

Judge Matthew J. Perry Civility Award, 2012 Recipient

A/V Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

"Best Lawyers in America" - 2014 Edition, Insurance Litigation

Publications, Speeches & Seminars

"Declaratory Judgment Actions to Resolve Automobile Coverage Disputes," from Basic Insurance Law Continuing Legal Education Seminar; cited in THE LAW OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE IN SOUTH CAROLINA, South Carolina Bar Association Continuing Legal Education, 5th Ed., 2002.

Reported Cases

Evans v. Stewart, 370 S.C. 522, 636 S.E.2d 632, S.C. App., July 05, 2006 (No. 4161)

Williams v. Selective Ins. Co. of Southeast, 315 S.C. 532, 446 S.E.2d 402, S.C., June 20,
1994 (No. 24098)

Boozer v. Boozer, 300 S.C. 282, 387 S.E.2d 674, S.C. App., May 10, 1988 (No. 1447)

Hubbs v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 287 S.C. 579, 340 S.E.2d 532, S.C., January 13, 1986 (No. 22442)

Brown v. Howell, 284 S.C. 605, 327 S.E.2d 659. S.C. App., March 08, 1985 (No. 0414)

866.771.7900
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Advocacy
  • Commercial and Business Litigation
  • Insurance Defense
  • Litigation

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1972, South Carolina
1972, United States District Court, District of South Carolina
1974, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Law School Attended

University of South Carolina
Class of 1971
J.D.

University Attended

Presbyterian College
Class of 1968
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in 1945
Charlotte, North Carolina, December 13, 1945

Contact Information

Phone

866.771.7900

Fax

803.343.7017

Email

Send email to William H. Bowman, III


Office Information
William H. Bowman, III
Shareholder
Synergy Business Park 220 Executive Center Drive,
Columbia, SC 29210

Loading...

Logo
Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC (Columbia, South Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.