Robert P. Wood

Attorney in Columbia, SC
Bob Wood concentrates his practice in civil litigation, with particular emphasis in commercial litigation (including representation of creditors in bankruptcy court), real estate litigation, insurance litigation. He also counsels attorneys on legal ethics and defends legal malpractices suits and grievances.

Awards & Recognition

Listed in Best Lawyers in America - 2013-2014
Listed in Super Lawyers for Business Litigation - 2012-2014
Listed in Midlands Legal Elite - 2012-2014

Community Involvement
•Blythewood Historical Society
•Founding Member, Board of Directors
•Columbia Audubon Society
•Former President
•Carolina Bird Club
•Former President and Editor of its Ornithological Publication

Publications, Speeches & Seminars

Advising, Cajoling, Remediating, and Punishing
Recent Decisions on Contempt, Stay Violations, Rule 9011 Violations, Bad Faith, Discovery Abuse, and Sanctions in Bankruptcy Court in South Carolina (Robert P. Wood, Esq., Kevin R. Horton - May 2013)

News/Press Releases
August 20, 2014
ATTORNEYS LISTED IN 2015 BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA

October 1, 2013
15 ROGERS TOWNSEND ATTORNEYS NAMED MIDLANDS LEGAL ELITE

August 19, 2013
ROGERS TOWNSEND ATTORNEYS LISTED IN THE BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA

April 24, 2013
ROGERS TOWNSEND ATTORNEYS NAMED SUPER LAWYERS AND RISING STARS

October 1, 2012
ROGERS TOWNSEND ATTORNEYS NAMED LEGAL ELITE OF THE MIDLANDS

September 6, 2012
Shareholders Listed in The Best Lawyers in America 2013

March 28, 2012
Six Rogers Townsend attorneys recognized by Super Lawyers

803.744.1275
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Advocacy
  • Bankruptcy
  • Collections
  • Creditor - Lender Litigation
  • Foreclosure - Residential & Commercial
  • Litigation
  • Mortgage Banking & Creditor Services
  • Professional Liability
  • Title Resolution
  • Workouts

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1980, South Carolina
2005, Virgin Islands
1989, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
1997, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
1998, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
United States Court of Federal Claims

Credit Cards Accepted
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Law School Attended

University of South Carolina
Class of 1980
J.D.

University Attended

Furman University
Class of 1977
B.A.
cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1956
Camden, South Carolina, September 22, 1956

Associations & Memberships

Memberships
•South Carolina Bar - Professional Liability Committee
•Virgin Islands Bar Association
•American Board of Trial Advocates
̶... More

Representative Cases

Reported Cases; Charleston Area Fed. Credit Union v. Duffy (In re Duffy), C/A No. 09-06778-dd, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1432 (Bankr. D.S.C. May 4, 2010)In re Gunter, May 2010 (In re Gunter, C/A No. 10-00547-jw, slip op. (Bankr. D.S.C. May 27, 2010))Bank of New York v. Sumter County, 691 S.E.2d 473 (S.C. 2010)Investors Title Ins. Co. v. Bair, 296 Fed App'x... More

Contact Information

Phone

803.744.1275

Fax

803.343.7017

Email

Send email to Robert P. Wood


Office Information
Robert P. Wood
Shareholder
Synergy Business Park 220 Executive Center Drive,
Columbia, SC 29210

Loading...

Logo
Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC (Columbia, South Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.