Shapiro, Shapiro, Shapiro

Law Firm in Cleveland, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation Claims
  • Ohio Industrial Commission Claims
  • Occupational Disease
  • Injuries
  • Accidents
  • Chemical Exposures
  • Workplace Exposures
  • Diesel Fumes
  • Workplace Chemicals
  • Substantial Aggravation of Pre-Existing Condition
  • District Hearing Officer
  • Appeals to the Court of Common Pleas and jury trials
  • Mandamus Actions
  • Appeals to the Ohio Supreme Court
  • Heart Attack Claims
  • Coronary Artery Disease Claims
  • Direct Causation claims
  • Cause or Aggravation of arthritis
  • Wage Loss claims
  • Violation of the Specific Safety Code
  • Pre-Existing Injury Claims
  • Staff Hearing Officer
  • Average Weekly Wage
  • Appeals to the Court of Appeals
  • Daubert Cases & Challenges
  • Cases that are more than five years old
  • Cases that are more than ten years old
  • Fibromyalgia claimsReflex Sympathetic Dystrophy claims.

Overall Client Rating

in Workers Compensation
3.4 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 10 reviews
  • Recommended by 6 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 05/13/13
Posted by a Consumer on 11/10/12
1.5 out of 5.0
Fail to show or provide representation (Once) Failed to show but provided alternate representation (3 times) Failed to devote time to case and in the end was persuaded by opposing Attorney to dismiss me as a client. Two years of allowing my approved injury downgraded until it was almost completely disallowed and percentage reduced from 18% to 5%. I paid them over $3,000 and received about $300 worth of legal representation.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Related Law Firms

Cleveland, Ohio
216-245-4215 | Email
Client Rating

4.8 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

Beachwood, Ohio
216-285-1874 | Email
Client Rating

4.9 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.