Marc E. Dann

Attorney in Cleveland, OH
Former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann has been fighting for homeowners, consumers and small businesses since he began his private practice in 1990 after serving as Antitrust Director for the West Virginia Attorney General’s office.

Dann has represented thousands of consumers and brought dozens of class action cases on behalf of consumers both in private practice and as Ohio’s Attorney General.

As Member of the Ohio Senate in from 2003 through 2006, he co-sponsored a comprehensive predatory lending law that was among the best in the nation. Dann also introduced bills and amendments to strengthen and protect Ohio Consumers. Those legislative efforts include bills and amendments to extend the statute of limitations for victims of child sexual abuse, to expand and protect the rights of victims of crime, to extend the reach of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act and the Federal Telephone Solicitation Act.

Concerned with loan origination practices, Dann ran for Ohio Attorney General with a platform to protect homeowners. Working with the issue as Attorney General, Dann directed his attention to servicing and foreclosure practices of mortgage lenders and servicers. Dann initiated Securities Fraud Claims against the creators of Mortgage Backed Securities on behalf of Ohio’s Public Pension Funds – created with Governor Ted Strickland Ohio’s Save the Dream program – to provide one stop services to Ohio Homeowners facing foreclosure, assembled Ohio’s Organized Crime Commission to mobilize Mortgage Fraud Task Forces in Ohio’s major cities, challenged the standing of mortgage servicers to foreclose in cases where the State of Ohio was a party and worked with Former Ohio Chief Justice Tom Moyer to organize over 1200 volunteer lawyers to represent homeowners in foreclosure.

Dann is an active member of SAGE (Society of Attorneys General Emeritus) and the Democratic Attorney Generals’ Association.

Upon leaving office in May 2008, Dann volunteered to represent homeowners facing foreclosure and became even more concerned about the standing of certain servicers to foreclose on his clients. Recognizing that the problem of fraudulent foreclosure practices was epidemic in Ohio, he established the Dann Law Firm representing more than 200 homeowners in foreclosure in more than 40 different counties in Ohio.

In 2011, Dann and other lawyers filed a class action case against Ohio’s largest foreclosure mill law firm and has brought dozens of actions against Mortgage Loan Servicers and the law firms that represent them under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act. Dann is currently Lead Counsel in a putative class action Hlavsa v. Bank of America on behalf of homeowners promised and denied HAMP modifications. In 2012, Dann and other lawyers filed a second class action against foreclosure mills and lender processing services over fraudulent practices in the foreclosure process.

Dann’s firm has won dozens of dismissals of foreclosure cases filed against its clients, has facilitated the settlement of more than 100 foreclosure cases to the satisfaction of its clients and has won motions to vacate foreclosure judgments overturned on behalf of clients on motions to vacate.

Significant rulings achieved by Dann include:

*A ruling that an unattached allonge to a promissory note is not enforceable.
*A ruling that a Foreclosure Plaintiff that does not hold the note and mortgage prior to filing a foreclosure complaint does not have standing to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the Ohio Courts.

Dann is a graduate of the Max Gardner Boot Camp the most comprehensive training in foreclosure defense in the nation.

Unafraid to take on the largest financial institutions in the country, the Dann Law Firm has also become a resource to businesses in disputes with banks and other lenders who are fearful of the conflicts of interests that burden larger business law firms.

Dann will also take on criminal defense or family law cases where unique legal issues present themselves.

Expanding beyond representing homeowners, the Dann Law Firm has brought cutting edge consumer cases in the state and federal courts. Dann is experienced in representing construction trade labor unions, workers in wage theft overtime cases, whistleblowers in Federal Qui Tam Cases and parents in complex custody cases. Dann has successfully assisted clients with developing bankruptcy strategies and has brought affirmative claims against banks and financial institutions on behalf of clients. He has also assisted clients with state regulatory and compliance issues.
877-810-9348
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Peer Rating N/A help_info
  • Wage and Hour Violation
  • Labor
  • Labor Union
  • Consumer Law
  • Whistleblower
  • Government Fraud
  • Litigation
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Consumer Class Actions
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 13
  • Commercial Real Estate Litigation
  • Mortgage Law
  • Commercial Mortgages
  • Mortgage Securitization
  • Mortgage Bankruptcy
  • Mortgage Foreclosure
  • Quiet Title
  • Real Estate Bankruptcy
  • Real Estate Banking Law
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Real Estate Secured Lending
  • Bankruptcy
  • Bankruptcy Arbitration
  • Workouts Taxation
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 11
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 12
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 7
  • Bankruptcy Fraud
  • Bankruptcy Litigation
  • Bankruptcy Mediation
  • Bankruptcy Reorganization
  • Bankruptcy Taxation
  • Commercial Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Foreclosure
  • Commercial Insolvency
  • Commercial Workouts
  • Consumer Bankruptcy
  • Debt Relief
  • Debtor Bankruptcy
  • Foreclosures
  • Insolvency
  • Liquidations
  • Out of Court Debt Restructuring
  • Personal Bankruptcy
  • Pre-Bankruptcy Workouts
  • Receivership
  • Repossessions
  • Workouts

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law, Commercial Law and Personal Injury
4.4 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.5
Responsiveness
4.5
Quality of Service
4.5
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/24/13
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Managing Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1987, Ohio
1988, West Virginia and U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia (Inactive)
1991, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio and U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Case Western Reserve University
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of Michigan
    A.B.
    History

    Birth Information

    Born in 1962
    Evanston, Illinois, March 12, 1962

    Associations & Memberships

    Cleveland Metropolitan, Mahoning County, Trumbull County and Ohio State Bar Associations; Taxpayers against Fraud; AFLCIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    216-452-1027 Call Now

    Fax

    216-373-0539

    Mobile

    330-651-3131

    Email

    Send email to Marc E. Dann

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    Marc E. Dann
    Managing Partner
     4600 Prospect Avenue,
    Cleveland, OH 44103

    Loading...

    Logo
    The Dann Law Firm Co. LPA (Cleveland, Ohio)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.