Mark A. Ossian

Attorney in Clearwater, FL
Senior Management Editor, University of Florida Law Review, 1986. Certified Public Accountant, Florida, 1987. Certified Family Mediator, 1999.
727-474-4984
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Collaborative Family Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Business Law
  • Civil Practice
  • Mediation

 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 07/18/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, Florida
1988, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
1988, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
1988, U.S. Tax Court
U.S. Court of Claims

Credit Cards Accepted
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Florida College of Law
    Class of 1986
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of South Florida
    Class of 1982
    B.A.

    Associations & Memberships

    The Florida Bar; American Bar Association

    Certifications

    (Board Certified Marital and Family Lawyer, Florida Bar Board Of Legal Specialization And Education)

    Contact Information

    Phone

    (727) 726-3777 Call Now

    Fax

    (727) 797-6463

    Email

    Send email to Mark A. Ossian


    Office Information
    Mark A. Ossian
    Partner
    Suite 200 2201 N.E. Coachman Road, P.O. Box 5088,
    Clearwater, FL 33765

    Loading...

    Logo
    Park, Ossian, Barnaky & Park, P.A. (Clearwater, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.