John M. Lynch

Attorney in Clayton, MO
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.9 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Family Law
  • Civil Litigation


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Criminal Law
4.9 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Judge on 04/08/13
5.0 out of 5.0
When John Lynch comes into the courtroom I know that his clients will be given the best possible legal representation, he will be honest with the Court, he will be respectful to court personnel, he will demonstrate the highest professional behavior with other lawyers, and I will look forward to his next appearance. He is a fine person for whom I have the highest respect. E. Richard Webber, Senior United States District Judge.
Report abuse
Posted by a Judge on 03/27/13
5.0 out of 5.0
John is very intelligent and professional. I give him my highest recommendation for ethics and advocacy in my courtroom.
Report abuse
Posted by a Govt. Counsel on 03/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0
John is not only one of the most professional people I have met, John's legal abilities are that of one of the top criminal defense attorneys I have ever dealt with in my over 20 years of practice.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/12/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I consider John Lynch a top lawyer
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/12/13
5.0 out of 5.0
John is an very skilled trial attorney with the utmost standards. He is attentive to his client's needs and often sought out by other attorneys for advice and guidance. I hold him in the highest esteem, and I would recommend him for the highest rating available.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/12/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I just tried a seven-week very complicated multi-defendant RICO criminal trial with John in federal court in St. Louis. John is not only an outstanding lawyer in all the technical skills to be a top notch trial lawyer, but also displayed high ethical standards, tactical creativity and refreshing professionalism. John worked well with the other 6 lawyers, as well as the prosecution team.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, Missouri and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
2005, U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Featured Lawyers

Gillespie, Hetlage & Coughlin, L.L.C.
Clayton, U.S.A.
314-480-5551 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

First Defense DUI/Traffic Law
St. Louis, U.S.A.
314-690-5782 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A

Rating Not Shown

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.