Romanucci & Blandin, LLC

Law Firm in Chicago, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Airplane Accidents
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Bicycle Accidents
  • Birth Injury
  • Brain Injury
  • Burn Injury
  • Bus Accidents
  • Construction Injury
  • FELA Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Nursing Home Liability
  • Wrongful Death.
  • Personal Injury
  • Pharmaceutical Litigation
  • Police Misconduct
  • Premises Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Slip, Trip and Fall Injuries
  • Spinal cord Injuries
  • Taxicab Accidents
  • Train Accidents
  • Transportation Litigation
  • Trucking Accidents
  • Worker's Compensation

Overall Client Rating

in Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice and Workers Compensation
1.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 08/15/13
Posted by a Consumer on 08/15/13
1.0 out of 5.0
We met in March, 2012 to discuss bringing a case against a Physical Therapist whose negligence resulted in chronic pain and severe tendonitis in my replaced knee. I left with a signed contract and instructions that they would obtain my therapy records. I received a letter in December stating they were dropping me as a client, with no reason given. When I inquired about the records, they did not have any. No one had done any work, even though they knew the statute of limitations was near.
No Photo
Law firm response:
With all due respect to our client, this account is grossly inaccurate. Our office met with him 4 times to discuss his case, the PT records were reviewed by an attorney on our staff and because of the client's recovery the decision was made not to pursue.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Principal and Partner
Principal and Partner
Managing Attorney
Mediator/Arbitrator, Of Counsel
Of Counsel

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.