Evans, Loewenstein, Shimanovsky & Moscardini, Ltd.

Law Firm in Chicago, IL

About This Firm

The firm was founded by Arthur H. Evans in 1978; Daniel M. Loewenstein joined the firm in 1989, followed by David L. Shimanovsky in 1992 and Frank Moscardini, Jr., in 1994. At its inception, the firm concentrated in federal income tax, real estate, corporate, estate planning and probate matters and has now grown into a general practice firm providing a full range of legal services. In addition to the foregoing, Evans, Loewenstein, Shimanovsky & Moscardini, Ltd. is the Illinois Provider law firm for Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.

Areas of Law

  • General Practice. Corporate
  • Federal and State Taxation
  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Real Estate
  • Litigation in State and Federal Courts
  • Partnerships
  • Tort and Personal Injury Law
  • Mechanics Liens
  • Employee Benefits
  • Family Law
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Insurance and Labor.

Overall Client Rating

in Contracts, Bankruptcy and Debtor and Creditor
4.7 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 17 reviews
  • Recommended by 16 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/10/14
Posted by a Consumer on 06/10/14
5.0 out of 5.0
On three accounts this law firm provided specialized intervention to mediate disputes with 100%success rate in my favor. Professional top of the line legal services well worth the monthly prepaid fee.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Firm Details

Year Established


Firm Size


Contact Information

Firm Address

Evans, Loewenstein, Shimanovsky & Moscardini, Ltd.
130 S. Jefferson Street, Suite 350,
Chicago, IL 60661-5764

Phone 1


Phone 2





Send email to Evans, Loewenstein, Shimanovsky & Moscardini, Ltd.

Firm Website
Office Information
 130 S. Jefferson Street, Suite 350,
Chicago, IL 60661-5764


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.