Mark A. Sadd

Attorney in Charleston, WV
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, Eminent Domain and Zoning and Land Use. Licensed Real Estate Broker, West Virginia. Agent, First American Title Insurance Co. At-Large Member, Charleston City Council, 2003-2007. Member, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 2005—. Director, First Bank of Charleston, Inc. 2005—. Member, Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulcre of Jerusalem, 2008—.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 3.6 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Construction Law
  • Eminent Domain
  • Zoning, Planning and Land Use
  • Real Estate
  • Natural Gas
  • Natural Resources
  • Municipal Law


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Real Estate, Property Law and General Practice
3.6 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, West Virginia, U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Law School Attended

West Virginia University
Class of 1992

University Attended

University of Virginia
Class of 1986

Birth Information

Born in 1964
Charleston, West Virginia, June 5, 1964

Associations & Memberships

West Virginia State Bar.

Representative Cases

Mills v. VanKirk, 453 S.E.2d 678 (W.Va. 1994); County Commission of Boone County v. Hill, 460 S.E.2d 727 (W.Va. 1995); McCoy v. VanKirk, 500 S.E.2d 534 (W.Va. 1997); Lower Donnally Assocation v. City of Charleston, 575 S.E.2d 233 (W.Va. 2002); United Bank, Inc. v. Stone Gate Home Owners Association, Inc., S.E.2d (W. Va. 2007).

Contact Information




Send email to Mark A. Sadd

Office Information
Mark A. Sadd
BB&T Square, Suite 700 300 Summers Street, P.O. Box 1746,
Charleston, WV 25326-1746


Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins, PLLC (Charleston, West Virginia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.