Susan S. White LinkedIn

Attorney in Charleston, SC

Susan White was born in Charleston, South Carolina. She is a 1981 graduate of the College of Charleston and received her Juris Doctor degree from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1984. Ms. White served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Richard E. Fields, Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit for South Carolina. She is a member of the South Carolina Bar. Ms. White practices in the firm's foreclosure division.


Member: Moot Court Bar; The Order of Barristers. Law Clerk, Honorable Richard E. Fields, Circuit Judge, South Carolina, 1984-1985.
843-577-5460
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Foreclosures

     

    Peer Rating

    bv

    Overall Peer Rating

    4.4 out of 5.0
    • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Associate

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1984, South Carolina
    1985, U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina

    Law School Attended

    University of South Carolina
    Class of 1984
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Boston University

    College of Charleston
    Class of 1981
    B.A.
    cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1952
    Charleston, South Carolina, August 13, 1952

    Associations & Memberships

    Charleston County and American Bar Associations; South Carolina Bar; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Charleston Consumer Credit Association.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    843-577-5460

    Email

    Send email to Susan S. White


    Office Information
    Susan S. White
    Associate
     3955 Faber Place Drive, Suite 200,
    Charleston, SC 29405

    Loading...

    Logo
    Finkel Law Firm LLC (Charleston, South Carolina)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.