Lederer Weston Craig PLC

Law Firm in Cedar Rapids, IA
Bringing the experience of over 100 collective years of practice developed in hundreds of trials to each and every case

About This Firm

The lawyers of Lederer Weston Craig have collectively tried more than 200 civil jury trials and have more than 100 years of legal experience. Our lawyers have served as officers in state, national, and international organizations focused on civil defense trial practices.

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Products Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Torts
  • Insurance Defense
  • Adoption Law
  • Casualty Insurance Defense
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
  • Municipal Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Premises Liability
  • Professional Liability
  • Appellate Practice
  • Automobile Liability
  • Litigation
  • Professional Negligence.

Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 11/02/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Firm Details

Firm Size


Contact Information

Firm Address

Lederer Weston Craig PLC
118 Third Avenue SE, Suite 700, P.O. Box 1927,
Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-1927

Phone 1

877-520-9798 Call firm now

Phone 2





Send email to Lederer Weston Craig PLC

Office Information
 118 Third Avenue SE, Suite 700, P.O. Box 1927,
Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-1927


Office Hours
By appointment
By appointment

Other Offices
West Des Moines Office
4401 Westown Parkway, Suite 310 West Des Moines, Iowa
West Des Moines, Iowa Office: 4401 Westown Parkway, Suite 310, 50266.

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.