Christopher MacKenzie

Attorney in Carson City, NV
Law Clerk to Honorable Michael E. Fondi, First Judicial District Court, 1993-1994. Commissioner, 2001-2007 and Chairman, 2005-2007, Nevada Wildlife Commission. Member, 1998-2001 and Chairman, 1999-2001, Carson City Wildlife Advisory Committee. Chairman, Carson City Downtown Consortium, Business Action Group, 2008; Carson City Charter Review Committee, 2010-2012.
775-687-0202
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Contracts
  • Real Estate
  • Water Law
  • Partnerships
  • Business Law
  • Business Formation
  • Corporate Law
  • Governmental Relations/Lobbying

 

Peer Rating

bv

Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1993, Nevada, U.S. District Court, District of Nevada and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Law School Attended

University of Idaho
Class of 1993
J.D.

University Attended

University of Nevada at Reno
Class of 1990
B.S.
Business Administration

Birth Information

Born in 1967
Reno, Nevada, June 4, 1967

Associations & Memberships

Washoe County, First Judicial District and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Nevada.

Contact Information

Phone

775-687-0202

Fax

775-882-7918

Email

Send email to Christopher MacKenzie

Social Networking



Office Information
Christopher MacKenzie
Member
 402 North Division Street,
Carson City, NV 89703-4168

Loading...

Logo
Allison, MacKenzie, Pavlakis, Wright & Fagan, Ltd. (Carson City, Nevada)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.