Lynette M. Wenner

Attorney in Canon City, CO
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Civil Litigation
  • Alimony
  • Grandparents Visitation Rights
  • Probate
  • Guardianship and Conservatorship


Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
1.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 01/23/11
Posted by a Consumer on 01/23/11
1.0 out of 5.0
Lots of people recommended her but she was lousy for me. She didn't come to the last mtg with the mediator. Sent her husband who didn't know beans about my case.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1989, Florida and U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
1995, Colorado

Credit Cards Accepted
Law School Attended

Stetson University College of Law
Class of 1989

University Attended

Dowling College
Class of 1976

University of Arizona
Class of 1977
Masters of Education

University of Minnesota
Class of 1983
Education Specialist

Associations & Memberships

Fremont-Custer Counties, Colorado Bar Associations, and Florida Bar.

Contact Information


719-276-1000 Call Now

Office Information
Lynette M. Wenner
 831 Royal Gorge Boulevard, Suite 400,
Canon City, CO 81212-6709


Law Firm of Gillick & Wenner, P.C. (Canon City, Colorado)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.