James A. Sarrail

Attorney in Burlingame, CA
Phi Alpha Delta. Lecturer in: Business Law, Contracts, Sales and Insurance Law, Golden Gate University, 1970-1977.
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Civil Practice
  • General Liability
  • Insurance Defense
  • Insurance Bad Faith
  • Disability Insurance
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Contracts
  • Indemnity
  • Commercial Contracts
  • Breach of Contract
  • Product Liability
  • Construction
  • Insurance
  • Insurance Coverage
  • First and Third Party Insurance
  • Automobile Insurance Coverage
  • Automobile Liability
  • Casualty Insurance
  • Commercial Property Insurance
  • Fire Insurance
  • Civil Fraud
  • Fire Loss
  • Insurance Arbitration
  • Insurance Fraud
  • Insurance Litigation
  • Property Damage
  • Personal Liability
  • Property Insurance Coverage
  • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists
  • Negligence
  • Automobile Negligence
  • Commercial Vehicle Liability
  • Accidents
  • Bodily Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Catastrophic Injury
  • Head Injury
  • Psychological Injury
  • Sexual Abuse
  • Spinal Injury
  • Severe Burns
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Bicycle Accidents
  • Bus Accidents
  • Pedestrian Injuries
  • Personal Injury Mediation
  • Slip and Fall
  • Premises Liability
  • Negligent Security
  • Elevator Liability
  • Escalator Liability
  • Heavy Equipment Products Liability
  • Industrial Products Liability
  • Manufacturers Liability
  • Product Defects
  • Product Warning Labels
  • Motor Carrier Liability
  • Transportation Liability
  • Transportation Safety
  • Truck Accidents
  • Trucking Liability
  • Civil Liability
  • Torts
  • Intentional Torts
  • Tort Liability


Overall Client Rating

in Litigation and Personal Injury
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 05/08/11
Posted by a Consumer on 05/08/11
5.0 out of 5.0
James Sarrail has excellent communication skills, which he used to help me understand all the facets of our case. I am also extremely confident in his technical abilities and knowledge of the law, which he demonstrated through out this entire process. I also felt extremely comfortable in his presence and that I was well represented by Jim, especially during a deposition or court hearing.
Report abuse
Posted by a Corporation on 10/12/09
4.5 out of 5.0
He gets the job done and does so with class. He has a way of communicating with people in a calm and professional manner.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials


Managing Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1968, California
U.S. District Court Central District of California
U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of San Francisco School of Law, San Francisco, California
    Class of 1968

    University Attended

    Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
    Class of 1965
    Political Science, Honors: Dean's List

    Birth Information

    Born in 1943
    Omaha, Nebraska, May 20, 1943

    Associations & Memberships

    State Bar of California; Bar Association of San Francisco; San Mateo County Bar Association; Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California; Defense Research Institute; Pacific Coast Cl... More

    Contact Information

    Phone 1

    650-242-4320 Call Now



    Phone 2



    Send email to James A. Sarrail

    Office Information
    James A. Sarrail
    Managing Partner
     700 Airport Boulevard, Suite 420,
    Burlingame, CA 94010-1937


    Sarrail, Castillo & Hall, LLP (Burlingame, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.