Richard A. Grimm, III

Attorney in Buffalo, NY
Court Examiner, Fourth Appellate Division.
(716) 856-3500
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Litigation

     

    Peer Rating

    av

    Overall Peer Rating

    5.0 out of 5.0
    • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Partner

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1987, New York
    U.S. District Court, Western District of New York

    Credit Cards Accepted
    American Express
    Mastercard
    Visa
    Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    State University of New York at Buffalo
    Class of 1986
    J.D.

    University Attended

    St. Bonaventure University
    Class of 1983
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1961
    Buffalo, New York, July 28, 1961

    Associations & Memberships

    The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; New York State Trial Lawyers Association; Western New York Trial Lawyers Association.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    (716) 856-3500

    Fax

    (716) 856-3390

    Email

    Send email to Richard A. Grimm, III


    Office Information
    Richard A. Grimm, III
    Partner
    1100 Rand Building 14 Lafayette Square,
    Buffalo, NY 14203

    Loading...

    Logo
    Magavern Magavern Grimm LLP (Buffalo, New York)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.