Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP LinkedIn

Law Firm in Boston, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Acquisition Finance
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Anti-Kickback
  • Antitrust
  • Appellate Litigation
  • Asbestos Arbitration
  • Asset-Based Lending
  • Bad Faith Claims
  • Bankruptcy
  • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
  • Biologics
  • Biotech
  • Business & Technology
  • Business Method Patents
  • Buyouts
  • Capital Markets
  • Chapter 11
  • Chapter 91
  • Choate Investment Advisors
  • Class Actions
  • Clean-Tech
  • Clinical Trial Agreements
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Competition
  • Construction
  • Copyright
  • Corporate Compliance Programs
  • Coverage
  • Criminal Cross-Border Transactions
  • D&O Matters
  • Debtor-In-Possession
  • Deceptive/Unfair Trade Practices
  • Design Patent
  • Diagnostics
  • Discrimination
  • Distressed Assets
  • Distressed Debt
  • Drug Delivery/Formulation
  • E&O Matters
  • e-Health
  • Electronics
  • Emerging Companies
  • Employee Benefits & Benefit Plans
  • Employment
  • Encryption
  • Energy
  • Energy & Clean-Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Environmental
  • ERISA
  • Estate Administration
  • Executive Compensation & Benefits
  • False Claims Act
  • Family Businesses
  • Family Limited Partnership
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Finance & Restructuring
  • Financial Services Litigation
  • Foreclosure
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
  • Foundation
  • Fraudulent Transfers/Conveyances
  • Fund Formation
  • General Counsel
  • Genetic Engineering
  • Genomics
  • Government Enforcement & Compliance
  • Grants Management Investigations
  • Hart-Scott-Rodino
  • Health Informatics
  • Healthcare
  • Healthcare Finance
  • Healthcare Fraud
  • High Tech
  • HIPAA
  • Hospice
  • Hospital/Physician Networks
  • Industrial Design
  • Information Technology
  • Infringement
  • Initial Public Offerings/IPOs
  • Insurance & Reinsurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • International
  • Internet
  • Invention
  • Investigations
  • Investment Management
  • Junior Capital
  • Labor, Employment & Benefits
  • Land Use
  • Lending
  • Licensing
  • Life Sciences
  • Liquid Crystal
  • Litigation
  • Major Commercial Litigation
  • Medical Devices
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Mezzanine & Junior Capital
  • Microelectronics
  • Monopolies
  • Nanotechnology
  • Network
  • Neuroscience
  • New Media
  • Nominee Realty Trust
  • Non-Competition Agreements & Disputes
  • Open Source
  • Options Backdating
  • Patents
  • Patient Care
  • Personnel Manuals/Policies
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Photonics
  • Privacy & Data Security
  • Private Equity
  • Probate
  • Products Liability & Mass Torts
  • Project Finance
  • Proteomics
  • Public Companies
  • Public Utilities
  • Qui Tam Defense
  • Real Estate
  • Recapitalizations
  • Receiver/Receivership
  • Reductions in Force/WARN ACT
  • Reimbursement
  • Reinsurance
  • Restructuring
  • Second Lien
  • Section 363 Sales
  • Secured Debt/Secured Financing
  • Securities
  • Securities Litigation
  • Securitizations/Structured Finance
  • Semiconductor
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Software
  • Special Committees
  • Specialty Finance
  • Sports Finance
  • Stark
  • Start-Up Companies
  • Subordinated Financing
  • Tax
  • Tax Fraud
  • Technology
  • Telecommunications
  • Trade Secrets
  • Trademarks
  • Trusts
  • Venture Capital
  • Wealth Management
  • Whistleblowing
  • White Collar Defense
  • Will
  • Workout
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Zoning.
 

Overall Client Rating

in Litigation
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 02/04/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader, Litigation Department Co-Chair
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Retired Partner
Retired Partner
Practice Group Leader
Co-Managing Partner
Practice Group Leader
Retired Partner
Partner
Retired Partner
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Retired Partner
Trust Administrator
Co-Managing Partner
Practice Group Leader
Retired Partner
Business Department Chairman
Practice Group Leader
Partner
Practice Group Leader
Practice Group Leader
Of Counsel
Of Counsel
Of Counsel
Associate
Associate
Associate
Coverage Attorney
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate
Director of Marketing
Director of Human Resources
Director of Finance
Senior Manager, Trust Administration
Staff Scientist
Xiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li
Legal Support
Trust Administrator
Thomas H. McLean, PhD
Thomas H. McLean, PhD
Legal Support
Danielle M. Nihan, Ph.D.
Danielle M. Nihan, Ph.D.
Legal Support
Paul A. Nuzzi, PhD
Paul A. Nuzzi, PhD
Legal Support
Manager, Trust Operations & Accounting
John P. Rearick, Ph.D.
John P. Rearick, Ph.D.
Legal Support
Director of Professional Development
Trust Administrator
Trust Administrator



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.