Chris Gramm

Attorney in Bloomington, IL
Member, Federalist Society, 1998—. Assistant State's Attorney, McLean County, 2001-2003.
309-319-7244
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • DUI
  • Criminal Law
  • Real Estate
  • Traffic Tickets

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Bankruptcy and Criminal Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/15/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 2001, Illinois

Credit Cards Accepted
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Northern Illinois University
    Class of 2001
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Illinois State University
    Class of 1991
    B.A.

    University of Illinois
    Class of 1993
    M.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1971
    Normal, Illinois, August 25, 1971

    Languages

    Japanese

    Associations & Memberships

    McLean County and Illinois State Bar Associations.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    309-662-1090 Call Now


    Office Information
    Chris Gramm
    Member
     820 East Grove Street,
    Bloomington, IL 61701

    Loading...

    Logo
    Chris Gramm Attorney at Law (Bloomington, Illinois)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.