Philip G. Piggott

Attorney in Birmingham, AL
Philip G. (“Phil”) Piggott is a senior partner at Starnes Davis Florie and currently serves on the firm's Executive Committee.


Phil’s practice is devoted to civil litigation, including topics related to complex business litigation, health care related issues, and employment matters at the trial and appellate levels. He is admitted to practice in all state and federal courts in Alabama, as well as the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court.

Phil handles a diverse spectrum of commercial litigation including matters involving employment and civil rights, contractual disputes, medical malpractice and construction issues.

Phil is actively involved in the representation of health care institutions, physicians, and medical professionals in a variety of matters, including medical malpractice, civil rights, contract disputes, and disciplinary actions.


• Obtained a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence in Federal Court, in a jury trial where the claims were for racial discrimination/hostile environment/retaliatory discharge/negligent supervision.

• Successfully obtained a reversal by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, after oral argument, of a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff, in a Fair Labor Standards Act case involving allegations of non-payment of overtime in defending a professional guard service.

• Recently received an Order from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirming Summary Judgment in an Accounting Malpractice matter involving allegations of Fraud, Fraudulent Suppression and Accounting Malpractice.

• Recently argued a matter before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals involving the right to remove a matter to Federal Court and State statutory interpretation.

• Recently received an order affirming summary judgment from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals involving a 1983 claim for deliberate indifference against a health care provider.

• Recently obtained Summary Judgment in a Medical Malpractice/Wrongful Death/Deliberate Indifference matter pending in Federal Court.

• Recently received an Order from the Alabama Supreme Court affirming a Summary Judgment Order granted to health care providers in a Medical Malpractice matter involving allegations of misdiagnosis and mistreatment of a stroke victim.

• Recently obtained a defense verdict and an award on a counterclaim in a large construction dispute heard before the American Arbitration Association (AAA).

• Currently representing developers and general contractors in numerous State and Federal claims regarding allegations that toxic Chinese Drywall was utilized in properties owned by the Claimants.


While in law school, Phil was elected to the Order of the Barristers and was an Associate Editor of the American Journal of Trial Advocacy. He was a member of the Law School’s Moot Court Team as well as a member of the Jessup International Law Moot Court Team.

He is a member of the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC), Defense Research Institute (DRI), International Municipal Lawyers Association, Alabama Association of Municipal Attorneys, American Bar Association, and the Alabama State Bar Association.

Phil is also listed in the 2013 - 2015 editions of Best Lawyers in America for commercial litigation. Phil is an AV Preeminent rated attorney by Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings,TM which is the highest rating an attorney can receive from the national Peer Review Rating Program.


• On August 7, 2014, Phil gave a presentation before the Alabama State Bar's Workers' Compensation Section on the topic of Ethics and Law.

• Alabama Prisoner Litigation Reform Act: Attempting to Prohibit the Filing of Frivolous Pro Se Inmate Lawsuits, ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Report - Medicine and Law (Spring 2014).

• On August 13, 2013, Phil gave a speech on Legal Ethics at the Alabama Self Insurers Association (ASIA) Conference.

• On February 18, 2013, Phil made a presentation before the Jefferson County Mayors’ Association and the Birmingham Area Mayors’ Association with regard to the attack on the statutory cap on municipalities and municipal employees.

• Spoke to a group of physicians and nurse practitioners regarding medical malpractice and civil rights claims and how to avoid such claims.


12/18/2014 Workers' Compensation Bulletin - 2014 Case Law Update

8/20/2014 Seventeen Starnes Davis Florie Attorneys Named to the 2015 Edition of Best Lawyers

11/18/2013 Starnes Davis Florie Attorney Phil Piggott Obtains Judgment as a Matter of Law

8/30/2013 Sixteen Starnes Davis Florie Attorneys Named to the 2014 Edition of Best Lawyers

7/29/2013 Starnes Davis Florie's Workers' Compensation Defense Bulletin (Summer 2013)

9/19/2012 Seventeen Starnes Davis Florie Attorneys Named to the 2013 Edition of Best Lawyers

9/5/2012 Starnes Attorney Phil Piggott Prevails in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals

5/21/2012 Starnes Davis Florie Attorneys Obtain Affirmance from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

11/21/2011 Piggott Prevails Before Alabama Supreme Court

11/15/2011 Piggott & Salter Obtain Favorable Opinion From The Supreme Court of Alabama

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Business Litigation
  • Construction Litigation
  • Energy, Natural Resources & Land Use
  • Medical Malpractice Defense
  • Federal Black Lung Litigation
  • Government & Public Litigation
  • Labor & Employment


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1993, Alabama
United States Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Alabama
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Law School Attended

Cumberland School of Law
Class of 1993

University Attended

Rhodes College
Class of 1985

Birth Information

Born in 1962
Bracknell, England, June 23, 1962

Associations & Memberships


Phil is an active member of St. Luke's Episcopal Church where he is an Acolyte leader.

Representative Cases

Reported Cases; Drummond Co., Inc. v. Ala. Dept. of Transp., 206 WL438704 (Ala. 2006). King v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., 919 So.2d 1186 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005) . Drummond Co., Inc. v. Green, 895 So.2d 977 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004) . Drummond Co., Inc. v. Bonner, 848 So.2d 987 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002) . Drummond Co., Inc. v. Boatman, 825 So.2d 823... More

Contact Information






Send email to Philip G. Piggott

Office Information
Philip G. Piggott
 100 Brookwood Place, 7th Floor,
Birmingham, AL 35209


Starnes Davis Florie LLP (Birmingham, Alabama)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.