John E. Jones

Attorney in Binghamton, NY

John E. Jones joined Hinman, Howard & Kattell in 1988 and is a partner in the firm's Real Estate and Oil and Gas Practice Groups. Mr. Jones focuses his practice on commercial and residential real estate, oil and gas law, and cooperative ownership of real estate. He represents local, regional, and national banks and insurance companies in commercial and residential real estate lending transactions as well as buyers and sellers of commercial and residential real estate. He represents local cooperatives and homeowners associations and has worked with developers to form cooperatives, homeowners associations, and a senior residential community.

Mr. Jones has assisted clients with the purchase and sale of mineral rights, including severed mineral estates, and has advised lenders as they establish policies to address the impact of gas leasing on their mortgage portfolios.

He also has lectured to the New York State, Broome County, and Schenectady County bar associations on commercial real estate and oil and gas matters. He is a member of the Broome County Bar Association's committee on continuing legal education.

Mr. Jones was named an upstate Super Lawyer in 2010. He is a graduate of the Greater Binghamton Chamber of Commerce Broome Leadership Institute; a board member for the Southern Tier Zoological Society, an Advisor to Sepp, Inc., and a developer and manager of Senior Residential Communities.

Professional Memberships

Broome County Bar Association

American Bar Association

New York State Bar Association, Executive Committee Real Property Section, past co-Chair of Task Force on Gas Leasing and Wind Power

607-231-6738
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.6 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Real Estate and Financing
  • Residential Real Estate
  • Oil and Gas Law
  • Condominiums and Cooperatives

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Real Estate and General Practice
4.6 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
4.5
Analytical Capabilities
4.6
Judgment
4.7
Communication Ability
4.7
Legal Experience
4.6

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 04/29/13
5.0 out of 5.0
John is outstanding practitioner. He is responsive to inquiries from fellow attorneys, knows his law cold and always is cordial. A great attorney!
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/24/13
4.6 out of 5.0
A pleasure to work with
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/23/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Pleasant, Smart & Capable
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/23/13
5.0 out of 5.0
A credit to the profession
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 02/23/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have personally know John for several years, have heard him present at CLE meetings and have had multiple occasions to work with him in various commercial closings. He is very professional.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1989, New York and Connecticut
2013, Pennsylvania

Law School Attended

Boston College Law School
Class of 1988
J.D.

University Attended

Hartwick College
Class of 1984
B.A.
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1962
Johnson City, New York, September 10, 1962

Associations & Memberships

Professional MembershipsBroome County Bar Association
American Bar Association
New York State Bar Association, Executive Committee Real Property Section, past co-Ch... More

Contact Information

Phone

607-231-6738

Fax

607-723-6605

Email

Send email to John E. Jones


Office Information
John E. Jones
Partner
700 Security Mutual Building 80 Exchange Street, P.O. Box 5250,
Binghamton, NY 13902-5250

Loading...

Logo
Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP (Binghamton, New York)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.