Bruce F. Fain

Attorney in Billings, MT
Member, Idaho Law Review. Judicial Survey Editor, Judicial Survey, Environmental Law, 25 Idaho Law Review, 126, 1989-1990.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown

Areas of Law

Commercial LitigationEmployment LawBusiness AssociationsReal Estate
Commercial Litigation
Employment Law
Business Associations
Real Estate
Other Areas of Law
Bankruptcy Law, Creditors Rights, Zoning, Planning and Land Use


Peer Rating

Rating Not Shown
This lawyer has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by his or her peers.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1990, Montana and U.S. District Court, District of Montana
1992, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
1995, U.S. Supreme Court
1996, Texas
2004, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado and U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Law School Attended

University of Idaho
Class of 1990
magna cum laude

University Attended

Texas A & M University
Class of 1980

Birth Information

Born in 1958
Mexia, Texas, 1958


Capt., USAF, 1981-1987

Associations & Memberships

Yellowstone County and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Montana; State Bar of Texas; The American Health Lawyers Association.

Contact Information




Send email to Bruce F. Fain

Office Information
Bruce F. Fain
500 Transwestern II 490 North 31st Street, P.O. Box 2529,
Billings, MT 59103


Crowley Fleck PLLP (Billings, Montana)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.