Hubert Oxford, III

Attorney in Beaumont, TX
Phi Delta Phi; Tau Beta Pi; Phi Kappa Phi. Listed, Who's Who in South and Southwest, American Law, Practicing Attorneys, Finance and Industry and in Beaumont, Texas. Associate Editor, Texas Law Review, 1962-1963. Briefing Clerk to Judge Joe J. Fisher, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, 1966. Assistant District Attorney, Jefferson County, 1967. U.S. Commissioner, Eastern District of Texas, 1968-1970. Regent, 1978-1984 and Secretary, 1983, Lamar University. Member, Texas Air Control Board, 1984-1989. Chairman, Clean Air Study Committee, 69th Legislature, 1985-1986. Member: Government Reorganization Committee, 70th Legislature, 1987-1988; Texas Oil Spill Commission, Texas 72nd Legislature, 1992-. General Counsel, Lamar State College, 1989-1995.
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Admiralty & Maritime Law
  • Litigation & Appeals
  • Environmental Law
  • Toxic Torts
  • Municipal Corporations
  • Personal Injury - Defense
  • Personal Injury - Plaintiff


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials


Managing Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1963, Texas
1996, Oklahoma, Wyoming and Montana
1997, Colorado and District of Columbia
1975, U.S. Supreme Court
1967, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh and Fifth Circuits
1966, U.S. District Court, Eastern and Southern Districts of Texas
1994, U.S. District Court, Northern and Western Districts of Texas
1966, U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming
1975, U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
1975, U.S. Tax Court
1975, U.S. Court of Federal Claims
registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Texas, School of Law
    Class of 1963

    University Attended

    Texas A & M University
    Class of 1960
    Mechanical Engineering

    Birth Information

    Born in 1938
    Beaumont, Texas, September 25, 1938


    Captain, Judge Advocate, U.S. Air Force, 1963-1966

    Associations & Memberships

    Jefferson County (President; Member, Board of Directors, 1987-88) and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Texas (Chairman, Continuing Legal Education Committee, 1979-1981); Texas Associa... More


    (Board Certified, Civil Trial and Personal Injury Trial Law, Texas Board Of Legal Specialization)

    Bar Fellowship

    Texas Bar Foundation; American Bar Foundation.

    Representative Cases

    Compaq Computer v. Hal LaPray et al, 135 SW3d 657 (Tex. 2004); Plummer v. Plummer, 551 S.W.3d 840 (Tex.App.-Beaumont, 2001); Shaw v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., et al., 2000 WL 224,225 (E.D. Tex.2000); Schwartz v. Neches-Gulf Marine, Inc., 67 F.Supp.2d 768 (S.D.Tex. 1999); Shaw v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., et al., 19... More

    Contact Information






    Send email to Hubert Oxford, III

    Office Information
    Hubert Oxford, III
    Managing Partner
     3535 Calder, Ste. 300,
    Beaumont, TX 77706


    Benckenstein & Oxford, L.L.P. (Beaumont, Texas)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.