E. Mitchell Griffith

Attorney in Beaufort, SC
E. Mitchell Griffith is a founding partner in the firm of Griffith, Sadler and Sharp, P.A. He practices in the areas of automobile liability, construction litigation, premises liability, products liability, and direct action suits against insurance companies. Mr. Griffith graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting from Wofford College in Spartanburg, S.C., in 1980. While there he was a member of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity. After college, Mr. Griffith attended the University of South Carolina, obtained his Juris Doctor Degree in 1983, and passed the Bar that same year. Following law school, Mr. Griffith served as Law Clerk to the Honorable Luke N. Brown, Jr., Resident Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. In 1984, Mr. Griffith entered private practice in Beaufort, South Carolina. In 1992, Mr. Griffith and Ms. Sadler formed the firm of Griffith and Sadler, P.A., predecessor to the firm of Griffith, Sadler and Sharp, P.A. Mr. Griffith is active in the local Bar and in the South Carolina Bar. He has served as an officer of the Beaufort County Bar Association and was President from 1997-1999. Mr. Griffith is also active in the South Carolina Bar and formerly served on the Trial and Appellate Advocacy Section. He served as Chairman of the section from 2002-2003, and is currently President of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of the South Carolina Bar. He is a member of the South Carolina Defense Trial Attorneys' Association Executive Committee from 2004 to the present, the Defense Research Institute and American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) and was listed as a SUPER LAWYER 2011. Mr. Griffith's primary area of practice is in insurance defense. He has tried cases to a verdict in all five counties of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, which includes Beaufort, Hampton, Colleton, Jasper and Allendale counties, as well as other counties in the state courts of South Carolina. He is licensed in the South Carolina Federal District Court, United States District Court, District of South Carolina, and the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. In 2001, he received his Civil Court Mediation Training and is actively involved in the mediation of civil cases.
843-521-4242
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law
  • Insurance Defense
  • Premises Liability
  • Products Liability
  • Personal Injury
  • Slip and Fall
  • Wrongful Death
  • Personal Injury Defense
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Construction Mediation
  • Construction Litigation
  • Insurance

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1983, South Carolina
1985, U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Law School Attended

University of South Carolina
Class of 1983
J.D.

University Attended

Wofford College
Class of 1980
B.A.

Associations & Memberships

Beaufort County Bar Association (Past President); South Carolina Bar (President, Trial and Appellate Practice Committee, 2002); South Carolina Defense Trial Attorney's Association; Defense... More

Contact Information

Phone

843-521-4242

Fax

843-521-4247

Email

Send email to E. Mitchell Griffith


Office Information
E. Mitchell Griffith
Partner
 600 Monson Street, P.O. Box 570,
Beaufort, SC 29901

Loading...

Logo
Griffith, Sadler & Sharp, P.A. (Beaufort, South Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.