Andrew P. Sellers, Jr.

Attorney in Baton Rouge, LA
Law Clerk, Honorable J. Michael McDonald, 19th Judicial District Court, 1997-1998.
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Civil Practice
  • Trials
  • Insurance
  • Banking Law
  • Real Estate
  • Corporate Law
  • Oil and Gas Law
  • Labor Relations
  • Probate
  • Tax Law
  • Administrative Law
  • Admiralty Law
  • Environmental Law


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Litigation, Insurance and Personal Injury
5.0 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 11/15/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have known Drew for over 20 years and he is a great person and lawyer. I would recommend him for any task.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 11/09/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Conscientious lawyer, very well versed,
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1997, Louisiana

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Loyola University, School of Law
    Class of 1996

    University Attended

    Louisiana State University
    Class of 1992

    Birth Information

    Born in 1970
    New Orleans, Louisiana, May 31, 1970

    Associations & Memberships

    Baton Rouge and Louisiana State Bar Associations.

    Office Information
    Andrew P. Sellers, Jr.
     7967 Office Park Boulevard, P.O. Box 15948,
    Baton Rouge, LA 70895


    Powers, Sellers & Chapoton, LLP (Baton Rouge, Louisiana)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.