Louis J. Ebert LinkedIn

Attorney in Baltimore, MD

Louis J. Ebert is co-chair of the Creditors' Rights Department of Rosenberg Martin Greenberg with offices in Baltimore, Maryland and Wilmington, Delaware. Lou has represented secured creditors, including some of the largest banks and other commercial lenders in the country, in bankruptcy, commercial litigation, foreclosure and workout matters for more than 30 years. In bankruptcy cases, he regularly represents lenders in cash collateral proceedings, relief from the automatic stay proceedings, discharge litigation, 363 sales and confirmation of reorganization plan issues. He has represented financial services institutions in bankruptcy cases in Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Illinois, Florida, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts.

Lou also regularly represents lenders in commercial loan restructures, commercial litigation, foreclosure proceedings and secured creditor sales. He has represented financial services institutions in a substantial number of lender liability and fraudulent conveyance actions. In one of these cases, which he successfully argued on appeal before the Supreme Court of Virginia, his efforts resulted in the establishment of very favorable foreclosure law to lenders in the Commonwealth of Virginia. In a successful appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, he helped to establish very favorable law for debt collectors governed by the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. Lou has lectured and given numerous seminars on bankruptcy, workouts, consumer laws and related issues for various organizations including MICPEL and the National Business Institute. He is also a member of the Bankruptcy Bar Association for the District of Maryland, Inc.

Lou graduated magna cum laude and received his B.A. from the State University of New York at Buffalo and received his J.D. from George Washington University National Law Center, Order of the Coif, in 1976. He is admitted to practice in the state and bankruptcy courts in Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia and Delaware. In 2011, he was selected as one of The Best Lawyers in America in the bankruptcy field in the State of Maryland. Currently, he is serving on the Advisory Board of the 8th Annual Mid-Atlantic Bankruptcy Workshop.

Awards & Honors

· Best Lawyers in America (2011-2014) - Bankruptcy and Creditor-Debtor Rights Law, Litigation - Bankruptcy

· ALM Washington D.C. & Baltimore's Top Rated Lawyers (2012 - Bankruptcy)

Publications

· Pease Means No Peace for Maryland Lenders

· Life, Liberty, and... The Pursuit of Attorney's Fees Allowed by Contract


410.649.4995
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Creditors Rights
  • Bankruptcy
  • Loan Workouts
  • Lender Liability

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1976, Virginia
1977, District of Columbia and U.S. Court of Claims
1980, U.S. Supreme Court
1984, Maryland
1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
2005, Delaware

Law School Attended

George Washington University National Law Center
Class of 1976
J.D.
magna cum laude, Order of the Coif

University Attended

State University of New York at Buffalo
Class of 1973
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in 1951
New York, N.Y., April 28, 1951

Contact Information

Phone

410.649.4995

Email

Send email to Louis J. Ebert


Office Information
Louis J. Ebert
Partner
 25 South Charles Street, 21st Floor,
Baltimore, MD 21201-3305

Maintains an office in multiple locations
Loading...

Logo
Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP (Baltimore, Maryland)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.