Damian J. Mark LinkedIn

Attorney in Baltimore, MD

Experience

Mr. Mark is in the firm's Corporate and Securities Section and is Co-Chair of the Public Finance practice group. He has over 10 years' experience representing for profit and nonprofit businesses, municipalities, utilities, financial institutions and other organizations and individuals in a wide array of financing, banking and corporate transactions.

Public Finance; Real Estate Finance; Bonds and Tax-Exempt Financing

· Multi-year representation of large regional water and wastewater system in financing of system improvements

· Representation of national network of nonprofit retirement communities in tax-exempt financings

· Representation of affiliated nonprofit retirement communities in Pennsylvania and Maryland in $200 million refinancing and corporate restructuring

· Restructuring of over $150 million in publicly held debt in troubled nonprofit organizations

· Representation of public and private institutions of higher education, as well as private secondary schools, in financing and refinancing construction projects

· Multi-year representation of multi-hospital health care system in financing expansions and refinancing existing debt aggregating $180 million

· Representation of non-profit clients in connection with mergers, acquisitions and related transactions

· Representation of numerous institutions in interest rate swaps and other hedging transactions, and in connection with the unwinding/termination of the such transactions

· Assist small firm counsel in representing their clients in connection with hedging transactions

· Represent private equity firms in connection with purchase of derivative products, including synthetic notes

Nonprofit Organizations and Associations

· Representation of nonprofit organizations in corporate governance matters

· Representation of nonprofit organizations in connection with financings and corporate restructurings

· Obtain 501(c)(3) determination letters from the Internal Revenue Service for nonprofit organizations

Mergers & Acquisitions

· Represent for profit and nonprofit institutions in connections with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, affiliations and similar transactions

· Represent large financial institutions in connection with credit card portfolio acquisitions and coordinate HSR filings and clearances in connection with the same

International Practice

· Represent U.S entities in connection with borrowing in foreign currencies from foreign lenders

· Provide U.S. legal opinions in connection with various aspects of international business transactions

Franchise Law

· Representation of restaurants, franchisors and other service companies in connection with franchise registrations, trademark licensing and franchise development company arrangements

· Representation of franchisees, master franchisees, area developers and multi-unit operators

General Information

· Member: National Association of Bond Lawyers

· Firm Representative: Lexwork Americas Business Group, Lexwork International

· Member: Business Law Section and Franchise Law Committee, Maryland State Bar Association

· Member: ABA Forum on Franchising

· Speaker on financing issues at Building in Tough Times seminar

· Author, Book Review: The Uruguay Round and the Future of International Trading, Maryland Journal of International Law and Trade

· Pro Bono Counsel to the Craig Willinger Fund, Kingdom Harvest Discipleship Ministries, Inc. and My Father's Heart, Inc.

· Board Member: Acts4Youth

Articles

08/06/2009
Client Alert: SEC Proposes Amendments to Rule 15C2-12
Introduction

01/26/2007
FTC Issues Annual Revised HSR Thresholds
The attached alert has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended for legal advice. Antitrust counsel should be consulted both prior to consummating any transaction to insure that the appropriate HSR Act filing thresholds have been considered and prior to filing any...

07/31/2006
Electronic Filing Now Available for HSR Premerger Notifications
Effective June 23, 2006, the Federal Trade Commission has amended the premerger notification rules of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended ("HSR Act"). [1] The amended Rules now allow for electronic filing of the Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers...

02/10/2006
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act Changes
The FTC has recently issued several important changes relating to the reporting requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (the "HSR Act") which I thought might be of interest to you. These changes are detailed in the attached HSR Act Alert.

410.347.8777
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Business and Corporate Law
  • Public Finance
  • Real Estate Finance
  • Bonds and Tax-Exempt Financing
  • Nonprofit Organizations and Associations
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • International Practice
  • Franchise Law

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Co-Chair of Public Finance Group

Admission Details

Admitted in 1999, Maryland

Law School Attended

University of Maryland School of Law
Class of 1998
J.D.
with honors

University Attended

State University of New York
SUNY

Albany
Class of 1995
B.A.
with honors

Birth Information

Born in 1972
New York, N.Y., 1972

Associations & Memberships

Maryland State (Member, Business Law Section and Franchise Law Committee) and American (Member, Forum on Franchising) Bar Associations; National Association of Bond Lawyers.

Contact Information

Phone

410.347.8777

Fax

410.223.4377

Email

Send email to Damian J. Mark


Office Information
Damian J. Mark
Co-Chair of Public Finance Group
 7 Saint Paul Street,
Baltimore, MD 21202-1626

Loading...

Logo
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P. (Baltimore, Maryland)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.