Catherine L. Kyle LinkedIn

Attorney in Austin, TX
Phi Eta Sigma. National Merit Scholar. Member, City of Austin Ethics Review Commission, 2004-2009. West Austin Neighborhood Group, Board Member; Hill Country Ride for AIDS, Board President.
512-474-9124
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Employment Law
  • Products Liability
  • Construction Defects

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, Texas
U.S. District Court, Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Baylor University School of Law
    Class of 1986
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of Texas at Austin
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    with honors

    Associations & Memberships

    Austin Bar Association (Member: Board of Directors, 1998-2000; TCBA Annual Meeting Committee, 2001; Law and Medicine Committee, 1997; Adult Education Committee, 1996; Bar and Grill Committee,... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    512-474-9124

    Fax

    512-474-8582

    Email

    Send email to Catherine L. Kyle


    Office Information
    Catherine L. Kyle
    Of Counsel
     301 Congress Avenue, 21st Floor,
    Austin, TX 78701

    Loading...

    Logo
    Chamberlain • McHaney (Austin, Texas)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.