Michael W. Huseman

Attorney in Aurora, IL
Mr. Huseman has been a partner in the firm since 2011. He represents businesses and individual clients in a wide variety of civil litigation practice areas in both the Illinois and Federal Court systems. He has successfully argued cases before the Illinois Appellate Courts and the Illinois Supreme Court. Mr. Huseman also manages the consumer and creditor bankruptcy practices at Dreyer Foote.

Mr. Huseman regularly handles litigation and bankruptcy matters in Kane, Kendall, Will, DuPage, DeKalb, McHenry, Grundy, and LaSalle Counties.

Professional Associations and Memberships:

- Illinois State Bar Association

- Illinois Creditors Bar Association

- DuPage County Bar Association

- Kane County Bar Association

- Will County Bar Association

- National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Creditors' Rights
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Landlord-Tenant
  • Appellate Practice
  • Traffic/Misdemeanors


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2003, Illinois
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Member of the Trial Bar

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Northern Illinois University College of Law
    Class of 2003
    cum laude

    University Attended

    St. Joseph's College
    Class of 2000

    Birth Information

    Born in 1977
    Crown Point, Indiana, October 16, 1977

    Contact Information

    Office Information
    Michael W. Huseman
     1999 W. Downer Place,
    Aurora, IL 60506


    Dreyer, Foote, Streit, Furgason and Slocum A Professional Association (Aurora, Illinois)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.