Scott Monge

Attorney in Atlanta, GA
As Seen on TV - Author of "Secrets to Win Your Injury Case" and "How to Win Your Case and Get a Big Settlement" - Perfect 10 Attorney Ranking. We Come to You.

Growing up as oldest of four children on the plains of the Midwest I didn't have any lawyers in my family and it was a challenge making a career choice in law. I knew I wanted to help people and I felt a career in law gave me the best opportunity to help others. I made the decision to hang my shingle out and open my practice in the South because I have always had an admiration for people, such as immigrants, that go to a new land to experience the American Dream of starting with little or nothing and going as far as their hopes and dreams will take them. I was blessed in my pursuit of the American Dream to have the two greatest gifts one can have from loving parents which are both roots and wings. Also, I had the advantage of starting from such a relatively low place that I did not have far to fail. One of my core beliefs is that no one makes it alone in this world and I was fortunate on my path to develop relationships with friends, colleagues and others without which my pursuit of the American Dream would not be possible.
Since opening in my practice in 1993 with the mission of helping people win their cases my practice has grown to approximately 50 members and we have helped thousands win their legal cases. I have been on television, print media and social media related to services provided by my law firm. In addition, I give each client a Satisfaction Guarantee that guarantees satisfaction with the level of customer service provided by our Firm. Since attorney client communication is very important to me I give each client a Client Bill of Rights that delivers basic rights to which I believe all clients are entitled.
877-711-8644

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Social Security Disability
  • Spine Injury
  • Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect
  • Drug/Medical Devices

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 09/15/14
Posted by a Consumer on 09/15/14
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
THE LAWYERS ARE GREAT AND VERY PATIENCE...
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 08/28/14
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I had a very good experience. I called and someone came out immediately. I would recommend your office and would come back in the future.
Report abuse

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Founder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1993, Georgia

Law School Attended

Southern Illinois University School of Law
Class of 1992
J.D.

University Attended

Eastern Illinois University
Class of 1988
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in 1967
1967

Associations & Memberships

Member Alabama Association for Justice 2013–present;
Trial Lawyer American Association for Justice 2013–present;
Trial Lawyer American Bar Association 2013R... More

Representative Cases

Greene v. Spivey, et. al.
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Date: Nov 16, 2010
Outcome: $800,000 Record Trial Verdict
Description:Motor Vehicle Collision in which Harry Spivey negligently collided with Sheila Greene causing moderate damage to vehicles and multiple injuries which later required surgery;Wood, Evans v. Tolbert
Prac... More

Hobbies & Interests

When not working I enjoy running, movies, traveling, and spending time with family.

Contact Information

Phone

678-579-0203 Call Now

Email

Send email to Scott Monge

Social Networking



Office Information
Scott Monge
Founder
 Statewide We Come to You, Locations Everywhere,
Atlanta, GA 30350

Loading...

Logo
Accident Attorneys of Monge & Associates (Atlanta, Georgia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.