Erich N. Durlacher

Attorney in Atlanta, GA
Erich has extensive experience in the representation of secured lenders and other financial institutions in debt restructurings, workouts and forbearance agreements; the negotiation and closing of commercial loans; the prosecution of receivership and other judicial actions to protect, preserve, and recover collateral; and Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

Erich also routinely represents the purchasers of assets in Chapter 11 case in all phases of the transaction from the securing of stalking horse bid protections to the negotiation and closing of the asset sale transaction.

Erich has extensive experience in the representation of secured lenders and other financial institutions in debt restructurings, workouts and forbearance agreements; the negotiation and closing of commercial loans; the prosecution of receivership and other judicial actions to protect, preserve, and recover collateral; and Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

Erich also routinely represents the purchasers of assets in Chapter 11 case in all phases of the transaction from the securing of stalking horse bid protections to the negotiation and closing of the asset sale transaction.
Personal QA

What is your favorite thing about the law?
The trust built between lawyer and the client and the responsibility that comes with this special relationship.

TESTIMONIALS
Erich is extremely efficient and responsive which results in a high level of trust in our relationship.

-Anonymous

Erich is a tremendous resource for our company. He has superior legal knowledge accompanied by strong negotiation skills. These attributes coupled with a strong conviction to great customer service and an affable personal style yields great results for us.

-Anonymous
Erich is a great partner and attorney. His solutions are creative, effective and efficient and he and his team do a great job with execution.

-Anonymous
I appreciate Erich's attention to detail. He is always responsive to my requests, particularly when the matter is time sensitive. I have found that his advice on course of action is always sound. I always feel that Erich has the best interests of the Bank in mind when recommending strategy.

-Anonymous

Honors & Awards
Chambers USA, Leading Practitioner in Bankruptcy /Restructuring (2009-2014)
Atlanta Magazine's Georgia Rising Stars (2009-2011)
Martindale-Hubbell AV Rated Attorney
Georgia Trend Magazine's Legal Elite 2012
Georgia Super Lawyers Bankruptcy & Creditor/Debtor Rights (2014)
Georgia Super Lawyers Rising Star, Bankruptcy & Creditor/Debtor Rights (2005, 2009-2011)

Resources
Burr Alert: Proposed Legislation Would Allow Employees to Possess Firearms in Privately Owned Vehicles on Employer's Property
Cure and Reinstatement of Home Mortgages in Chapter 13: Florida's Bright-Line Rule is Not So Bright
American Bankruptcy Institute Journal: Applicability of USTP Guidelines to Bankruptcy Administrators
Burr Alert: Who Will Think of the Tenants: Split in Authority Regarding the Interplay Between Bankruptcy Code Sections 363(f) and 365(h)(1)(A)
Burr Alert: Make 'Em Pay! Sovereign Nation or Not

News
Six Burr & Forman Attorneys Selected Among Georgia Super Lawyers and Rising Stars for 2014
Burr Expands Atlanta Corporate Practice with Chet Hosch
Burr's Scott Hitch Selected for Green Chamber of the South's Board of Directors
Eight Burr Attorneys Selected as 2013 Georgia Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
Eight Burr Attorneys Named to Georgia Trend's Legal Elite 2012

(404) 685-4313
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.9 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Avoidance Actions
  • Distressed Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Commercial Real Estate Finance
  • Debtor in Possession Financing
  • Real Estate
  • Receiverships
  • Section 363 Sales
  • Workouts & Restructurings
  • Bankruptcy-Litigation

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Bankruptcy and Debtor and Creditor
4.9 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
5.0
Analytical Capabilities
4.9
Judgment
4.9
Communication Ability
4.8
Legal Experience
4.9

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1998, Louisiana
1999, Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
U.S. District Court - Middle District of Georgia
U.S. District Court - Northern District of Georgia
U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Middle District of Georgia
U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Northern District of Georgia
U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Eastern District of Louisiana
U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Middle District of Louisiana
U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Western District of Louisiana
U.S. District Court - Middle District of Louisiana
U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Louisiana
U.S. District Court - Western District of Louisiana

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Tulane University Law School
    Class of 1998
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University Attended

    Hampden-Sydney College
    Class of 1993
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1971
    Pompton Plains, New Jersey, June 7, 1971

    Associations & Memberships

    Professional Associations
    American Bankruptcy Institute
    Turnaround Management Association
    Commercial Finance Association
    State Bar of Georgia
    Stat... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    (404) 685-4313

    Fax

    (404) 214-7387

    Email

    Send email to Erich N. Durlacher


    Office Information
    Erich N. Durlacher
    Partner
     171 Seventeenth Street, NW, Suite 1100,
    Atlanta, GA 30363

    Loading...

    Logo
    Burr & Forman LLP (Atlanta, Georgia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.