Mr. Michael E. Ciochina

Attorney in Asheville, NC
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Support
  • Child Custody
  • Domestic Violence
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Adoption Law
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Traffic Violations
  • Visitation Rights
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Wrongful Death
  • Civil Litigation
  • Bankruptcy
  • Criminal Law
  • Driving While Intoxicated

 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
1.1 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
1.5
Responsiveness
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Value for Money
1.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 02/24/14
Posted by a Consumer on 02/24/14
1.0 out of 5.0
Mike is a special attorney for certain clients. He pretends to be a Christ follower, he spends his time in politically correct circles, but he has no problem telling lies, stealing, or doing whatever illegal or immoral thing his client may ask for. If you choose to live life with no religious conviction, have no moral sense of obligation, or really just want someone who will help you take advantage of someone, Mike is a good choice for you. He has two beautiful daughters, and like Lot, he'd...
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, Florida
1997, North Carolina


Featured Lawyers
Loading...


The Moore Law Office, PLLC
Asheville, U.S.A.
828-258-8053 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

Jack W. Stewart, P.A.
Asheville, U.S.A.
828-253-5673 | Email
Client Rating

4.8 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.