Taylor King & Associates, P.A.

Law Firm in Arkadelphia, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Medical Negligence
  • Auto Accidents
  • Truck Accidents
  • Slip & Fall Injuries
  • Traumatic Brain Injury.
  • Defective Products
  • Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect
  • Disability Crimes
  • Wrongful Death

Overall Client Rating

in Personal Injury and Trusts and Estates
3.2 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 9 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 09/21/13
Posted by a Consumer on 09/21/13
1.5 out of 5.0
they took too long on our case, and lied to us
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 05/12/13
1.8 out of 5.0
I had to collect my own paperwork and call hospitals to get correct bills myself, but Taylor King & Associates charged me as if they did the work.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 03/03/13
4.3 out of 5.0
If I received any mail from the people we were suing, I had no trouble getting my lawyer on the phone and taking care of the problem, also when I was being sent to collections for a medical bill that Taylor King had already paid for, He made all the necessary calls to find out that they had the money, they just had not told collections yet. Great Work!
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Office Manager
Legal Assistant/Intake Specialist
Case Manager
Case Manager
Community Resources
Case Manager/Negotiator
Intake Specialist
Settlement Manager
Litigation Assistant
Litigation Assistant
Case Manager/Negotiator
Case Manager
Case Manager
Case Manager
Settlement Manager
Case Manager
Related Law Firms

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.