Thomas E. Dew

Attorney in Ann Arbor, MI
Thomas E. Dew has extensive experience in advising clients in all areas of federal tax law, including income tax, corporate tax, partnership tax, employee benefits, estate and gift taxation and the organization and operation of tax-exempt organizations (both private foundations and public charities). Mr. Dew has over 25 years' experience handling tax disputes, appeals and United States Tax Court litigation. Mr. Dew also has extensive experience in counseling "start-up" and emerging business entities; arranging business financing (including venture capital negotiations and equity private placements); mergers and acquisitions; business purchases and sales and business succession planning. He also serves as general counsel to numerous small and mid-size corporations and limited liability companies. In addition to his business and tax practice, Mr. Dew has extensive experience in estate and trust administration; assists clients in asset protection planning; and designs and implements highly sophisticated estate planning of all kinds. Mr. Dew has over five years experience with the Internal Revenue Service; serving both as a Revenue Officer responsible for the collection of unpaid federal taxes and later as a Revenue Agent, specializing in the examination of federal estate tax and gift tax returns. He also has six years experience as a Vice-President at the Ann Arbor Trust Company (now KeyBank), handling estate planning, estate administration and trust tax matters. Mr. Dew is a member of the State Bar of Michigan, the Washtenaw County Bar Association (where he is a past Chairperson of the Tax Section), the Washtenaw Estate Planning Council (where he is a past President), and the New Enterprise Forum. He also has served as an investigator for the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission and is the Chairman of the Washtenaw County discipline hearing panel of the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board. He is a
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Taxation Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Business Succession Planning
  • Probate
  • Business Law


Overall Client Rating

in Taxation and Trusts and Estates
4.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 03/15/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials


Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1974, Michigan and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
1980, U.S. Tax Court

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Michigan State University College of Law
    Class of 1974

    University Attended

    University of Michigan
    Class of 1969

    Birth Information

    Born in 1947
    Detroit, Michigan, 1947

    Associations & Memberships

    Washtenaw County Bar Association; State Bar of Michigan; Washtenaw Estate Planning Council; Planned Giving Roundtable of Southeast Michigan (Professional Advisory Committee); Ann Arbor Area Commu... More

    Bar Fellowship

    of the Michigan State Bar Foundation and his biography is listed in Who's Who in American Law and Who's Who in America. He also has served as the President of the Ann Arbor Public Housing Commission as is a former Trustee of the Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation and has served as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the Ave Maria School of Law in Ann A... More

    Contact Information


    734-994-1295 Call Now




    Send email to Thomas E. Dew

    Office Information
    Thomas E. Dew
    Of Counsel
     301 N. Main Street, Suite 250,
    Ann Arbor, MI 48104


    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.