Help

Emile H. Banks, Jr.LinkedIn

Emile H. Banks, Jr. 5.0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
Emile H. Banks, Jr. is a Lawyer in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Client Rating 5.0 / 5.0
Submit a review
Peer Rating 5.0 / 5.0
414-777-0000
View Web Site

Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Insurance Litigation
  • Negligence Law
  • Insurance Coverage Law
  • Product Liability Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Employment Law
  • Personal Injury Litigation
  • Environmental Law
  • Medical Malpractice Defense
  • Securities Litigation
  • Transportation Law

Contact Information

Currently Employed at

Emile Banks & Associates, LLC
Senior Partner
High Pointe, Suite 290 1200 North Mayfair Road,
Milwaukee, WI 53226
U.S.A.

Maintains an office in more than one location.

Phone

414-777-0000

Fax

414-777-0090

Email

Send email to Emile H. Banks, Jr.

Website
 

Overall Client Rating

in Civil Rights, Insurance and Personal Injury
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/05/11
Posted by a Consumer on 10/05/11
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Emile Banks and his employees are great.
Posted by a Consumer on 09/03/10
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Attorney Banks treated my case with the utmost compassion and understanding. It was an absolute pleasure to have him representing me.
Posted by a Consumer on 08/17/10
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
He is a wonderful, compassionate and caring litigator.

Experience & Credentials

Admission Details

Admitted in 1984, Wisconsin and U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Wisconsin

Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
Law School Attended

Ohio Northern University

J.D.
Class of 1984

University Attended

Cardinal Stritch College
Class of 1981
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in February 2,1959
Chicago
Illinois

Associations & Memberships

State Bar of Wisconsin (Member, Chief Judge Subcommittee on Juror Treatment and Selection); American Bar Association; Wisconsin Association of Minority Attorneys; Civil Trial Counsel of Wisconsin; Defense Research Institute; International Association of Defense Counsel; National Association of Bond Lawyers; National Association of Minority & Women Owned Law Firms; Council on Litigation Management.

Representative Cases

Cefalu v. Continental Western Ins. Co., 2005 WI App. 187, 285 Wis. 2d 766, 703 N.W.2d 743; Rebernick v. Wausau Gen. Ins. Co., 2005 WI App. 15, 278 Wis. 2d 461, 692 N.W.2d 348, aff'd 2006 WI 27, 289 Wis. 2d 324, 711 N.W.2d 621; Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc., 2003 WI App. 226, 267 Wis. 2d 827, 672 N.W.2d 71, aff'd 2004 WI 86, 273 Wis. 2d 106, 682 N.W.2d 328; Pachowitz v. LeDoux, 2003 WI App. 120, 265 Wis. 2d 631, 666 N.W. 2d 88; Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, 220 Wis. 2d 889, 584 N.W.2d 188 (Ct. App. 1998); aff'd, 2000 WI 29, 233 Wis. 2d 371, 607 N.W.2d 637; Fernandez v. Strand, 63 F.Supp. 2d 949 (E.D. Wis. 1999); Ellsworth v. Shelbrock, 229 Wis. 2d 542, 600 N.W.2d 247 (Ct. App. 1999); Geibel v. Richards, 224 Wis. 2d 468, 591 N.W.2d 901 (Ct. App. 1999); Madison Newspapers, Inc. v. Pinkertons, 200 Wis. 2d 468, 545 N.W. 2d 843 (Ct. App. 1996); Chapman ex rel Chapman v. Mutual Serv. Cas. Ins. Co., 35 F.Supp. 2d 693 (E.D. Wis. 1993); Chapman ex rel Chapman v. Mutual Serv. Cas. Ins. Co., 35 F.Supp. 2d 699 (E.D. Wis. 1993); Davenport v. Gilmore, 146 Wis. 2d 498, 431 N.W. 2d 701 (Ct. App. 1988).

Biographical Details

Phi Alpha Delta. Associate Research Editor, Ohio Northern Law Review, 1982-1983. Super Lawyer for Wisconsin, 2005-2009 (top 50, 2008-2009). Member, Supreme Court of Wisconsin Board of Attorney Professional Responsibility. Board Member, State Bar of Wiscons... More
Office Information
Emile H. Banks, Jr.
High Pointe, Suite 290 1200 North Mayfair Road,
Milwaukee, WI 53226
U.S.A.
Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.