×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Mr. Scott Am Chambers

Mr. Scott Am Chambers

5.0
1 review

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036-6802

General Practice, Antitrust & Trade Law, Corporate, Commercial and Business Law and 4 more

About Mr. Scott Am Chambers

Mr. Scott Am Chambers is a lawyer practicing general practice, antitrust & trade law, corporate, commercial and business law and 4 other areas of law. Scott received a B.S. degree from Ohio State University, Columbus, OH in 1974, and has been licensed for 33 years. Scott practices at Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C. in Washington, DC.

Mr. Scott Am Chambers (Washington, District of Columbia)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Scott

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2014
Hired Attorney

Services

Areas of Law

  • General Practice
  • Business Law 1
    • Corporate, Commercial and Business Law
  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Technology and Science 1
    • Life Sciences
  • Other 1
    • Antitrust & Trade Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Benitec Australia Ltd. v. Nucleonics, Inc., 495 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
    Abbott Laboratories v. Novapharm, Ltd., 323 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
    Emergency Fuel, LLC v. Pennzoil-Quaker State Co., 71 Fed. Appx. 826 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
    In re Dance, 160 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
    In re Clement, 131 F.3d 1464 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
    In re Emert, 124 F.3d 1458 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
    Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lehman, 109 F.3d 756 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
    In re Mayne, 104 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
    Merck & Co., Inc. v. Kessler, 80 F.3d 1543 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
    In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
    Honigsbaum v. Lehman, 903 F. Supp. 8 (D.D.C. 1995)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1996, District of Columbia
    1993, Virginia
    United States Supreme Court
    US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    US Patent, Trademark Office
    Memberships

    Organizations/Memberships

    •Biotechnology Law Report, Editorial Board member
    •Patent Trademark and Copyright Journal, Advisory Board member
    •Biojudiciary Project
    •Adjunct faculty, Georgetown University Law School
    Catholic University Law School
    George Washington Law School

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
    Class of 1974
    B.S.

    Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
    Class of 1981
    Ph.D.

    Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse, NY
    Class of 1999
    Certificate of Public Administration

Mr. Scott Am Chambers

Principal at Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C.
5.0
1 review

Suite 710, 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036-6802U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Jocelyn S. Szymanowski
Pro
Jocelyn S. Szymanowski
5.0
6
General Practice lawyer
443-909-4791
View Profile
John S. Wisniewski, Esq.
Pro
John S. Wisniewski, Esq.
4.7
13
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

732-360-6947
View Profile
Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
Pro
Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
5.0
2
General Practice lawyer
443-909-4915
View Profile
Julie Teresa Oliver-Zhang
Pro
Julie Teresa Oliver-Zhang
4.8
46
General Practice lawyer
771-218-3541
View Profile
Roderick E. Edmond, M.D., J.D.
Pro
Roderick E. Edmond, M.D., J.D.
5.0
2
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

404-689-5892
View Profile

Email Mr. Scott Am Chambers

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions