|
|
Address
1477 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 101, P.O. Box 1111
McLean, Virginia 22101 (Fairfax Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Merrell & Merrell, P.C. represents individuals, businesses, trusts and estates in disputes with the I.R.S. regarding the determination and collection of civil tax liabilities and the resolution of criminal tax matters. The firm represents clients in audits and appeals conferences and before the Tax Court, Court of Federal Claims, Federal District Courts, Circuit Courts of Appeal and Supreme Court. Statement of PracticeTax Law, Tax Controversies, Tax Litigation, Tax Appeals, Tax Audits, Tax Fraud, Tax Valuation, Tax Planning. Firm Size: 2
Address1477 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 101 P.O. Box 1111
McLean, VA 22101, (Fairfax Co.)
PhonePhone: 703-790-8440
Fax: 703-790-8944
Website
http://www.merrelltaxlaw.com
John Y. Merrell Jr. (Member) born Washington, D.C., February 12, 1947; admitted to bar, 1976, Virginia; 1979, U.S. Tax Court; 1980, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Claims Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 1983, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Education: Brigham Young University (B.A., summa cum laude, 1972); Stanford University (J.D., 1975). Phi Kappa Phi. Member, Editorial Board, Stanford Law Review, 1973-1975. Member: Fairfax, Virginia and American (Member, Sections on: Litigation; Taxation) Bar Associations; Virginia State Bar. Special Agencies: Internal Revenue Service. Reported Cases: Consolidation Coal Company v. U.S., 95 A.F.T.R. 2d 2005-1771 (Ct. Cl. 2005); First Federal Savings and Loan Assoc. v. U.S., 660 F.2d 767 (Ct. Cl. 1981); Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc. v. U.S., 708 F.2d 1043 (6th Cir. 1983); Rowe v. U.S., 655 F.2d 1065 (Ct. Cl. 1981); McClelland v. Comm'r, 83 T.C. 958 (1984); Lambert v. U.S., 56 A.F.T.R.2d 85-6575 (W.D. Va. 1985). Languages: French. Practice Areas: Federal Taxation; Tax Controversies; Tax Litigation.Email: John Y. Merrell Jr.
OF COUNSELJohn Y. Merrell (Of Counsel) born Brigham City, Utah, February 21, 1918; admitted to bar, 1946, District of Columbia, U.S. Tax Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; 1947, U.S. Claims Court; 1949, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; 1957, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 1959, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1963, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 1971, Virginia; 1973, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third and Fifth Circuits; 1983, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Education: Brigham Young University (A.B., 1942); George Washington University (J.D., with honors, 1948). Phi Delta Phi. Member: Virginia State Bar; American Bar Association. Reported Cases: Lupowitz Sons, Inc. v. Comm'r, 497 F.2d 862 (3d Cir. 1974); Winters Coal Co., Inc. v. Comm'r, 496 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1974); King v. Comm'r, 458 F.2d 245 (6th Cir. 1972); Paragon Jewel Coal Co., Inc. v. Comm'r, 380 U.S. 624 (U.S. Supreme Court 1965); Tri-City Advertising v. Comm'r, 1988 T.C.M. No. 19. Practice Areas: Federal Taxation; Tax Controversies; Tax Litigation.Email: John Y. Merrell
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|