|
|
Address
1601 Elm Street, Suite 1995
Dallas, Texas 75201 (Collin, Dallas & Denton Cos.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeConsumer Class Actions and Fraud, Commercial and Complex Litigation, Insurance Insolvency and Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy. Firm Size: 3
Address1601 Elm Street, Suite 1995
Dallas, TX 75201, (Collin, Dallas & Denton Cos.)
PhonePhone: 214-857-6000
Fax: 214-857-6001
Website
http://www.hblawfirm.com
Stephen L. Hubbard (Member) born Dallas, Texas, February 28, 1950; admitted to bar, 1977, Texas, U.S. District Court, Northern, Western, Eastern and Southern Districts of Texas and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth and Eleventh Circuits. Education: University of Texas (B.A., 1974); St. Mary's University (J.D., 1977). Research and Symposium Editor, St. Mary's Law School Journal, 1976-1977. Author: Note, "Re-apportionmentPotential Dilution of Minority Voting Strength," 7 St. Mary's Law Journal 447, 1975; Comment, "Medical Liability Insurance," 7 St. Mary's Law Journal 802, 1976. Instructor, Legal Research and Writing, St. Mary's Law School, 1976-1977. Member: Dallas and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Texas. Reported Cases: In re The Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practice Litigation, 962 F.Supp. 450 (D.N.J. 1997), aff'd 148 F3d 283 (3rd Cir. 1998); Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 989 F.Supp. 375 (D.Mass. 1998). Practice Areas: Consumer Class Actions; Fraud; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Insolvency; Litigation.Email: Stephen L. Hubbard
Robert W. Biederman (Member) born Chicago, Illinois, October 22, 1952; admitted to bar, 1978, Illinois and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; 1985, Texas; 1986, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas; 1989, U.S. District Court, Eastern, Southern and Western Districts of Texas; 1992, Massachusetts; 1995, California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Education: Sarah Lawrence College (B.A., 1973); Loyola University (J.D., 1978). Author: "Cases of First Impression: Prosecuting and Defending Against Motions for Temporary Restraining Order," Vol. 70, No. 9 Illinois Bar Journal, May, 1982; "Classification in Single-Asset Bankruptcy Cases: Debtor and Lender Strategies," Vol. 3, No. 6, Real Estate Workouts & Asset Management, December 1994; "Taming the Beast: Creditor Strategies Under Section 105 (a) of the Bankruptcy Code," Bankruptcy Litigation, Vol. 3, No. 4, Fall, 1995. Member: Dallas and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Texas; State Bar of California. Reported Cases: In re The Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practices Litigation, 962 F.Supp. 450 (D.N.J. 1997), aff'd 148 F3d 283 (3rd Cir. 1998); Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 989 FSupp. 375 (D.Mass. 1998). Practice Areas: Consumer Class Actions; Fraud; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Insolvency; Litigation; Bankruptcy.Email: Robert W. Biederman
——————————David M. Grossman (Associate) born Tampa, Florida, January 14, 1968; admitted to bar, 1993, Texas; U.S. District Court, Northern and Western Districts of Texas. Education: University of Texas at Austin (B.A., 1990; J.D., 1993). Member: Dallas and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Texas (Litigation and Consumer Law Sections). Practice Areas: Consumer Class Actions; Fraud; Commercial Litigation; Insurance; Consumer Finance.Email: David M. Grossman
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|