|
|
Address
Highland Park Place
4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 600
Dallas, Texas 75205-4193 (Collin, Dallas & Denton Cos.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeAppellate Practice in State and Federal Courts. Insurance Coverage Analysis and Litigation. Year Established: 1997
Firm Size: 1
Representative Clients:Western World Insurance Group
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company.
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
AddressHighland Park Place
4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 600
Dallas, TX 75205-4193, (Collin, Dallas & Denton Cos.)
PhonePhone: 214-559-7107
Facsimile: 214-559-7101
Website
http://www.robertghoguelaw.com
Robert G. Hogue (Member) born Omaha, Nebraska, May 30, 1962; admitted to bar, 1987, Texas; U.S. District Court, Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Education: University of Texas at Arlington (B.A., with high honors, 1984); University of Texas (J.D., 1987). Member, Texas International Law Journal, 1985-1987. Member: State Bar of Texas. (Board Certified, Civil Appellate Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization). Reported Cases: American States Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 133 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 1998); City of Lancaster v. Chambers, 883 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. 1994); Eli Lilly and Co. v. Marshall, 850 S.W.2d 164 (Tex. 1993) (orig. proceeding); Eli Lilly and Co. v. Marshall, 850 S.W.2d 155, 61 U.S.L.W. 2518 (Tex. 1993) (orig. proceeding); Eli Lilly and Co. v. Marshall, 829 S.W.2d 157 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); Lance v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 934 S.W.2d 427 (Tex. App.--Waco 1998, no writ); Guerra v. Sentry Ins. Co., 927 S.W.2d 733 (Tex. App.--Eastland 1998, writ denied); Eli Lilly and Co. v. Biffle, 888 S.W.2d 808 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, no writ); Dalon v. City DeSoto, 852 S.W.2d 530 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1992, writ denied); Maayeh v. Trinity Lloyds Ins. Co., 850 S.W.2d 193 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1992, no writ); Chambers v. City of Lancaster, 843 S.W.2d 143 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1992), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 883 S.W.2d 650; M.J.R. Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 803 S.W.2d 428 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1991, no writ); Schachar v. Northern Assurance Co. of Am., 788 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1990, writ denied); United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Blakemore, 782 S.W.2d 277 (Tex. App.--Waco 1989, writ denied); Elbar, Inc. v. Claussen, 774 S.W.2d 45 (Tex App.--Dallas 1989, writ denied); Fulton v. Texas Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 773 S.W.2d 391 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1989, writ denied). Practice Areas: Appellate Practice; Insurance; Automobile Insurance; Commercial Insurance; Insurance Bad Faith; Property Insurance; Complex Settlements.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|