|
|
Address
511 New Highway 96 West, Suite 204
Franklin, Tennessee 37064-2557 (Williamson Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeChild Custody, Family Law, Divorce, Child Support, Appellate Practice, Civil Appeals, Trials in State and Federal Courts. Year Established: 1978
Firm Size: 1
Michael W. Binkley (Member) born Nashville, Tennessee, August 13, 1951; admitted to bar, 1978, Tennessee; 1992, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Education: Birmingham Southern College (B.A., 1974); Vanderbilt University (J.D., 1977). Listed in Best Lawyers in America, 2009 and 2008. Author, "The Use of Experts in the Valuation of Businesses in Divorce Cases," The Tennessee Trial Lawyer, May 1995. Seminar Speaker: "Opening Statements in Personal Injury Trials," Tennessee Bar Association, November 19, 1993; "Ask the Experts," Family Law, Tennessee Bar Association, March 3, 1994; "Family Law, The Use of Experts in the Valuation of Businesses in Divorce Cases," Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association Annual Convention, June 11, 1994; "Effective Family Practice in Tennessee - Commencing the Dissolution Process: Initial Considerations," National Business Institute, March 26, 1996; "The People's Law School, Domestic Relations," Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association, June 1997; "Child Custody and Time Sharing in Tennessee," June 29, 1999; "Family Law in Tennessee, Valuation of Marital Businesses in Tennessee, Appreciation of Separate Property, Comingling and Transmutation of Property During the Marriage," Lorman Educational Services, August 24, 2000; "Domestic Law in Tennessee," National Business Institute, August 29, 2002; "Marital Property Distribution and Discovery," Second Annual Cumberland Family Law Seminar, September 16, 2002; "Family Law in Tennessee, Alimony," Lorman Educational Services, November 20, 2003; "Family Law in Tennessee, Alimony," Lorman Educational Services, November 2, 2004; "Family Law in Tennessee, Alimony," Lorman Education Services, November 2, 2005; "Critical Drafting Techniques for Marital Dissolution Agreements," Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association, April 5, 2007. Member: Nashville Bar Association; Tennessee Bar Association; Williamson County Bar Association; American Bar Association; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Tennessee Association for Justice, formerly Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association (Member, Board of Governors, 1980-1982); Tennessee John Marshall Chapter of the American Inn of Court. Fellow: Nashville Bar Foundation. (Also at Franklin Office). Reported Cases: State v. Leaphart 673 S.W.2d 870 (Tenn.Crim.App. 1983); Hoyle v. Wilson 746 S.W.2d 665 (Tenn, 1988); Harrington v. Harrington 759 S.W.2d 664 (Tenn.App. 1988); Jones v. Jones 748 S.W.2d 349 (Tenn.App. 1989); Harris v. Harris 832 S.W.2d 352 (Tenn.App. 1992); Kincaid v. Kincaid 912 S.W.2d 140 (Tenn.App. 1995); Sheri Weiner (Kirshner) Rubin v. Howard Lee Kirshner 948 S.W. 2nd 742, 1997 WL 381260 (Tenn.App. 1997); Smith v. Smith, 984 S.W. 2d 606 (Tenn.App. 1997); Crabtree v. Crabtree 165 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000); Smith v. Smith, 93 S.W.3d 871 (Tenn.App. 2002); Solima v. Solima, 7 S.W.3d 30 (Tenn.App. 1998); Steen v. Steen, 61 S.W.3d 324 (Tenn.App. 2001); Means v. Ashby, 130 S.W.3d 48 (Tenn. App. 2003); Mimms v. Mimms, 234 S.W.3d 634 (Tenn. 2007); Keyt v. Keyt, 244 S.W.3d (Tenn. 2007). Practice Areas: Matrimonial Law; Divorce; Child Custody; Domestic Relations; Marital Property Law; Marital Property Distribution and Settlements; Domestic Torts; Family Law.Email: Michael W. Binkley
LEGAL SUPPORT PERSONNELMarrianne Baugh Email: Marrianne Baugh
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|